Lenaerts Marc E
Department of Neurology, Oklahoma University Health Sciences Center, 711 Stanton L. Young Blvd., Suite 215, Oklahoma City, OK 73104, USA.
Curr Pain Headache Rep. 2005 Dec;9(6):442-7. doi: 10.1007/s11916-005-0025-4.
Although tension-type headache typically is not as disabling as migraine, its chronic form may significantly impair patients' functional ability. The pathogenesis of tension-type headache remains largely unknown. Compared with migraine, tension-type headache is the object of much less research. For a number of years, research on headache therapy has vastly emphasized migraine. Even cluster headache, which is far less frequent than tension-type headache, has been subject to more therapeutic trials than tension-type headache. Therefore, it is not surprising that since the advent of studies (as early as 1964) on amitriptyline, which remains a pivotal treatment choice, the number of emerging treatments for this condition remains scarce, even in 2005. This emphasizes the need for renewed interest in this field. However, alternate treatment approaches, such as botulinum toxin injections, albeit controversial, have renewed hopes lately. In addition, recent progress in the understanding of tension-type headache pathophysiology, such as the role of peripheral and central sensitization, has revived interest in the field. This is a review of available, proven, or suspected prophylactic therapies for tension-type headache.
尽管紧张型头痛通常不像偏头痛那样使人丧失能力,但其慢性形式可能会显著损害患者的功能能力。紧张型头痛的发病机制在很大程度上仍然未知。与偏头痛相比,紧张型头痛的研究要少得多。多年来,头痛治疗的研究极大地侧重于偏头痛。甚至比紧张型头痛频率低得多的丛集性头痛,接受的治疗试验也比紧张型头痛更多。因此,自关于阿米替林的研究(早在1964年)出现以来,即使到了2005年,针对这种疾病的新治疗方法仍然很少,这并不奇怪。这凸显了对该领域重新产生兴趣的必要性。然而,诸如肉毒杆菌毒素注射等替代治疗方法,尽管存在争议,但最近重新燃起了希望。此外,最近在紧张型头痛病理生理学理解方面的进展,比如外周和中枢敏化的作用,重新唤起了该领域的兴趣。这是一篇关于紧张型头痛现有、已证实或疑似预防性治疗方法的综述。