Beuker Benn J, van Deursen Robert W, Price Patricia, Manning Erik A, van Baal Jeff G, Harding Keith G
Diabetic Foot Unit, Department of Surgery, Twenteborg Hospital, Almelo, The Netherlands.
Wound Repair Regen. 2005 Nov-Dec;13(6):537-42. doi: 10.1111/j.1524-475X.2005.00075.x.
Four off-loading devices used for the treatment of diabetic forefoot ulcers were compared: a custom-molded insole shoe, a cast MABAL shoe, a prefabricated pneumatic walking brace, and a bivalved total contact cast (BTCC). It was anticipated that all devices would significantly reduce forefoot plantar pressure compared with a control shoe. Sixteen healthy volunteers participated. Plantar pressures were evaluated using the Pedar system, while walking speed was determined using an optoelectric timer. Peak pressure (PP) of ten plantar areas and pressure-time integral for the first metatarsal area were analyzed statistically using a repeated measures analysis of variance. Forefoot pressures were significantly reduced compared with the control shoe for all devices (p<0.001). PP was most reduced (by 65.8%) for the BTCC, and pressure-time integral was most reduced for the BTCC and cast MABAL shoe. Small but significant differences between devices in walking speed (p<0.05) could not explain the substantial PP differences between the different devices. Although all off-loading devices resulted in a significant reduction of forefoot plantar pressure, devices differed significantly in the magnitude of pressure reduction. Further research will have to reveal the level of off-loading sufficient for effective treatment of diabetic ulcers.
定制模制鞋垫鞋、铸型MABAL鞋、预制充气步行支具和双瓣全接触石膏(BTCC)。预计与对照鞋相比,所有装置都会显著降低前足底压力。16名健康志愿者参与了研究。使用Pedar系统评估足底压力,同时使用光电定时器确定步行速度。使用重复测量方差分析对十个足底区域的峰值压力(PP)和第一跖骨区域的压力-时间积分进行统计学分析。与对照鞋相比,所有装置的前足压力均显著降低(p<0.001)。BTCC的PP降低最多(65.8%),BTCC和铸型MABAL鞋的压力-时间积分降低最多。装置之间在步行速度上存在微小但显著的差异(p<0.05),但这无法解释不同装置之间PP的显著差异。尽管所有减压装置都能显著降低前足底压力,但装置在减压幅度上存在显著差异。进一步的研究将不得不揭示足以有效治疗糖尿病溃疡的减压水平。