Restuccia Domenico, Della Marca Giacomo, Marra Camillo, Rubino Marco, Valeriani Massimiliano
Department of Neurosciences, Catholic University, Policlinico A. Gemelli, L.go A. Gemelli 8, 00168 Rome, Italy.
Brain Res Cogn Brain Res. 2005 Dec;25(3):891-9. doi: 10.1016/j.cogbrainres.2005.09.023. Epub 2005 Nov 9.
According to the model hypothesized by Näätänen and Michie, the generation of the mismatch negativity (MMN) requires a mismatch detection, taking place in temporal areas, followed by the activation of frontal generators, underlying attention switching toward the deviant stimulus. We aimed at verifying whether the activation of temporal and frontal regions is dependent on the amount of attentional resources allocable toward the deviant stimulus. We recorded event-related potentials (ERPs) in nine healthy subjects while reading and during a demanding visual task (Multiple Features Target Cancellation, MFTC). Raw data were further evaluated by Brain Electrical Source Analysis (BESA). During the Reading condition, distraction toward the unattended auditory stimuli was reflected by the enhancement of the N1 response to frequent stimuli and by the elicitation of a P3a response to deviant ones. The MMN distribution was explained by bilateral temporal dipoles. During the MFTC condition, no P3a was detected, while source analysis showed the activation of a right frontal generator. Temporal dipoles showed no change between the two conditions: we thus conclude that the earlier mismatch detection is independent on the attentional load. By contrast, the activation of a right frontal subcomponent occurred only during the high-load task, independently on any actual attention shift reflected by the P3a component. We thus discuss the hypothesis whether the right frontal MMN generator, rather than subserving a simple attention switching toward the deviant stimulus, plays a role in modulating the auditory change detection system ("contrast enhancement" model).
根据纳塔宁和米基所假设的模型,失配负波(MMN)的产生需要在颞叶区域进行失配检测,随后额叶发生器被激活,这是将注意力转向偏差刺激的基础。我们旨在验证颞叶和额叶区域的激活是否取决于可分配给偏差刺激的注意力资源量。我们记录了9名健康受试者在阅读时以及在一项要求较高的视觉任务(多特征目标取消,MFTC)期间的事件相关电位(ERP)。原始数据通过脑电源分析(BESA)进一步评估。在阅读条件下,对频繁刺激的N1反应增强以及对偏差刺激引发P3a反应反映了对未注意听觉刺激的分心。MMN分布由双侧颞叶偶极解释。在MFTC条件下,未检测到P3a,而源分析显示右额叶发生器被激活。颞叶偶极在两种条件之间没有变化:因此我们得出结论,早期的失配检测与注意力负荷无关。相比之下,右额叶子成分的激活仅在高负荷任务期间发生,与P3a成分所反映的任何实际注意力转移无关。因此,我们讨论了这样一个假设,即右额叶MMN发生器是否在调节听觉变化检测系统(“对比度增强”模型)中发挥作用,而不是仅仅为将注意力简单转向偏差刺激服务。