Butler Richard, Inman David, Lobb Derek
Department of Pathology and Molecular Medicine, and Education Program in Anatomy, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada.
Adv Physiol Educ. 2005 Dec;29(4):194-6. doi: 10.1152/advan.00032.2005.
For almost four decades, problem-based learning (PBL) has been the stated cornerstone of learning in many medical schools. Proponents of PBL cite the open nature of the learning experience where students are free to study in depth, unencumbered by the burdens of broad courses based on the memorization of facts; detractors, on the other hand, cite the lack of breadth and factual knowledge required for professional qualification. Both points of view have merit. Professional schools have a different set of needs and requirements, and it is these that drive the curriculum and learning philosophies. The constraints of the professional school are so different from those of the purely academic environment that PBL, while admirably suited to the latter, is just problem solving in the former.
近四十年来,基于问题的学习(PBL)一直被许多医学院校宣称是学习的基石。PBL的支持者们提到学习体验具有开放性,学生可以不受基于事实记忆的宽泛课程的束缚,自由地进行深入学习;而另一方面,诋毁者们则指出,专业资格所需的广度和事实性知识有所欠缺。两种观点都有其合理性。专业院校有一系列不同的需求和要求,正是这些需求和要求驱动着课程设置和学习理念。专业院校的限制与纯学术环境的限制大不相同,以至于PBL虽然非常适合后者,但在前者中只是解决问题而已。