Hayes Steven C, Luoma Jason B, Bond Frank W, Masuda Akihiko, Lillis Jason
Department of Psychology, University of Nevada, Reno, NV 89557-0062, USA.
Behav Res Ther. 2006 Jan;44(1):1-25. doi: 10.1016/j.brat.2005.06.006.
The present article presents and reviews the model of psychopathology and treatment underlying Acceptance and Commitment Therapy (ACT). ACT is unusual in that it is linked to a comprehensive active basic research program on the nature of human language and cognition (Relational Frame Theory), echoing back to an earlier era of behavior therapy in which clinical treatments were consciously based on basic behavioral principles. The evidence from correlational, component, process of change, and outcome comparisons relevant to the model are broadly supportive, but the literature is not mature and many questions have not yet been examined. What evidence is available suggests that ACT works through different processes than active treatment comparisons, including traditional Cognitive-Behavior Therapy (CBT). There are not enough well-controlled studies to conclude that ACT is generally more effective than other active treatments across the range of problems examined, but so far the data are promising.
本文介绍并综述了接纳与承诺疗法(ACT)背后的心理病理学模型及治疗方法。ACT与众不同之处在于,它与一项关于人类语言和认知本质的全面的积极基础研究项目(关系框架理论)相关联,这可以追溯到行为疗法的早期,当时临床治疗是有意识地基于基本行为原则。与该模型相关的相关研究、成分研究、变化过程研究及结果比较的证据大体上是支持性的,但文献并不成熟,许多问题尚未得到研究。现有证据表明,ACT的作用过程与包括传统认知行为疗法(CBT)在内的积极治疗对照不同。目前没有足够的严格对照研究来得出ACT在所有研究问题上总体上比其他积极治疗更有效的结论,但到目前为止,数据很有前景。