Kwan Sharon W, Partik Bernhard L, Zinck Steven E, Chan Frandics P, Kee Stephen T, Leung Ann N, Voracek Martin, Rubin Geoffrey D
Department of Radiology, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA 94305-5105, USA.
AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2005 Dec;185(6):1500-8. doi: 10.2214/AJR.04.1335.
The objective of this study was to evaluate the accuracy and efficiency of primary interpretation of thoracic MDCT using coronal reformations as compared with transverse images.
Fifty patients (18 females, 32 males; age range, 15-93 years; mean age, 63.6 years) underwent 4-MDCT of the chest (detector width, 1 mm; beam pitch, 1.5). Contrast material was administered in 20 of the 50 patients. Coronal and transverse sections were reformatted into 5-mm-thick sections at 3.5-mm intervals. All available image and clinical data consensually reviewed by two thoracic radiologists served as the reference standard. Subsequently, three other thoracic radiologists independently evaluated reformatted coronal and transverse images at two separate review sessions. Each image set was assessed in 58 categories for abnormalities of the lungs, mediastinum, pleura, chest wall, diaphragm, abdomen, and skeleton. Interpretation times and number of images assessed were recorded. Sensitivity, specificity, and interobserver concordance were calculated. Differences in mean sensitivities and specificities were evaluated with Wilcoxon's signed rank test.
The most common findings identified were pulmonary nodules (n = 73, transverse images; n = 72, coronal images) and emphysema (n = 45, transverse; n = 40, coronal). The mean detection sensitivity of all lesions was significantly (p = 0.001) lower on coronal (44% +/- 26% [SD]) than on transverse (51% +/- 22%) images, whereas the mean detection specificity was significantly (p = 0.005) higher (96% +/- 5% vs 95% +/- 6%, respectively). Reporting findings for significantly (p < 0.001) fewer coronal images (mean, 63.0 +/- 4.6 images) than transverse images (mean, 91.9 +/- 8.8 images) took significantly (p = 0.025) longer (mean, 263 +/- 56 sec vs 238 +/- 45 sec, respectively).
Primary interpretation of thoracic MDCT is less sensitive and more time-consuming using 5-mm-thick coronal reformations as compared with transverse images.
本研究的目的是评估与横轴位图像相比,使用冠状位重组对胸部MDCT进行初步解读的准确性和效率。
50例患者(18例女性,32例男性;年龄范围15 - 93岁;平均年龄63.6岁)接受了胸部4层MDCT检查(探测器宽度1mm;螺距1.5)。50例患者中有20例使用了对比剂。冠状位和横轴位图像被重建成层厚5mm、间隔3.5mm的图像。两位胸部放射科医生共同对所有可用的图像和临床资料进行回顾,将其作为参考标准。随后,另外三位胸部放射科医生在两个独立的阅片环节中分别独立评估重建后的冠状位和横轴位图像。对每组图像在58个类别中评估肺部、纵隔、胸膜、胸壁、膈肌、腹部和骨骼的异常情况。记录解读时间和评估的图像数量。计算敏感性、特异性和观察者间一致性。使用Wilcoxon符号秩检验评估平均敏感性和特异性的差异。
最常见的发现为肺结节(横轴位图像73个,冠状位图像72个)和肺气肿(横轴位45个,冠状位40个)。所有病变的平均检测敏感性在冠状位图像上(44%±26%[标准差])显著低于横轴位图像(51%±22%)(p = 0.001),而平均检测特异性在冠状位图像上显著高于横轴位图像(分别为96%±5%和95%±6%,p = 0.005)。报告冠状位图像(平均63.0±4.6幅图像)的发现显著少于横轴位图像(平均91.9±8.8幅图像)(p < 0.001),且报告冠状位图像所用时间显著长于横轴位图像(分别为平均263±56秒和238±45秒,p = 0.025)。
与横轴位图像相比,使用层厚5mm的冠状位重组对胸部MDCT进行初步解读时敏感性较低且耗时较长。