Xiao Han B, Kaleem Shahla, McCarthy Carolyn, Rosen Stuart D
Department of Cardiology, Ealing Hospital, Uxbridge Road, Middlesex UB1 3HW, UK.
Int J Cardiol. 2006 Oct 10;112(3):316-21. doi: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2005.10.001. Epub 2005 Nov 23.
Global systolic and diastolic LV function assessed by conventional echocardiographic indices is often normal in patients with controlled hypertension, with or without left ventricular hypertrophy. However, it is not certain whether regional myocardial function in these patients remains normal. We investigated 26 patients and 10 age matched normal controls, by means of long axis M-mode echocardiography. There was no significant difference in age, sex distribution, heart rate, blood pressure and routine ECG measurements between the two groups. Although there was significant LVH in patients compared to normal controls, LV cavity size and global systolic function, assessed by shortening fraction, ejection fraction and mean velocity of circumferential fibre shortening did not differ between the two groups, nor did LV diastolic function, assessed by the mitral flow pattern. However, LV regional mechanics, as assessed by multiple long axis M-mode echocardiograms differed significantly, in both systole and diastole, between the two groups. Compared to controls, the total longitudinal systolic excursion in both LV free wall and ventricular septum were significantly reduced in patients, and so was maximum early relaxation and atrial contraction in the LV free wall. The mean rate of systolic excursion in all 3 sites did not differ between the two groups, but the mean rate of early relaxation in both LV free wall and ventricular septum was significantly decreased in patients compared to normal controls. In conclusion, the evaluation of LV dysfunction in patients who have achieved good blood pressure control requires more than a conventional echocardiographic assessment. The assessment of regional mechanics described in the present paper offers an easy and sensitive method for the detection of subtle signs of LV mechanical inefficiency associated with LVH.
通过传统超声心动图指标评估的全球左心室收缩和舒张功能在血压得到控制的高血压患者中通常是正常的,无论有无左心室肥厚。然而,这些患者的局部心肌功能是否仍保持正常尚不确定。我们通过长轴M型超声心动图对26例患者和10名年龄匹配的正常对照者进行了研究。两组在年龄、性别分布、心率、血压和常规心电图测量方面无显著差异。尽管与正常对照者相比,患者存在显著的左心室肥厚,但通过缩短分数、射血分数和圆周纤维缩短平均速度评估的左心室腔大小和整体收缩功能在两组之间并无差异,通过二尖瓣血流模式评估的左心室舒张功能也无差异。然而,通过多个长轴M型超声心动图评估的左心室局部力学在两组之间的收缩期和舒张期均存在显著差异。与对照组相比,患者左心室游离壁和室间隔的总纵向收缩位移均显著降低,左心室游离壁的最大早期舒张和心房收缩也显著降低。两组所有3个部位的收缩位移平均速率无差异,但与正常对照者相比,患者左心室游离壁和室间隔的早期舒张平均速率均显著降低。总之,对于血压已得到良好控制的患者,评估左心室功能障碍需要的不仅仅是传统的超声心动图评估。本文所述的局部力学评估为检测与左心室肥厚相关的左心室机械效率低下的细微迹象提供了一种简单而敏感的方法。