Brunas-Wagstaff J, Young A W, Ellis A W
University of Lancaster, U.K.
Q J Exp Psychol A. 1992 Apr;44(3):423-54. doi: 10.1080/14640749208401293.
Reaction times to make a familiarity decision to the faces of famous people were measured after recognition of the faces in a pre-training phase had occurred spontaneously or following prompting with a name or other cue. At test, reaction times to familiar faces that had been recognized spontaneously in the pre-training phase were significantly facilitated relative to an unprimed comparison condition. Reaction times to familiar faces recognized only after prompting in the pre-training phase were not significantly facilitated. This was demonstrated both when a name prompt was used (Experiments 1 and 3) and when subjects were cued with brief semantic information (Experiment 2). Repetition priming was not found to depend on prior spontaneous recognition per se. In Experiment 3, spontaneously recognizing a familiar face did not prime subsequent familiarity judgements when the same face had only been identified following prompting on a prior encounter. In Experiment 4, recognition memory for faces recognized after cueing was found to be over 90% accurate. This indicates that prompted recognition does not yield repetition priming, even though subjects can remember the faces. A fusion of "face recognition unit" and "episodic record" accounts of the repetition priming effect may be more useful than either theory alone in explaining these results.
在预训练阶段,对名人面孔的识别是自发发生的,或是在给出名字或其他提示后进行的,之后测量做出关于名人面孔熟悉度判断的反应时间。在测试时,相对于无启动的比较条件,对在预训练阶段自发识别的熟悉面孔的反应时间显著加快。对于仅在预训练阶段提示后才识别出的熟悉面孔,其反应时间没有显著加快。当使用名字提示时(实验1和3)以及当用简短语义信息提示受试者时(实验2),均证明了这一点。发现重复启动并不依赖于先前的自发识别本身。在实验3中,当同一面孔仅在先前相遇时提示后才被识别时,自发识别出熟悉面孔并不会启动随后的熟悉度判断。在实验4中,发现提示后识别出的面孔的识别记忆准确率超过90%。这表明,即使受试者能够记住面孔,提示识别也不会产生重复启动。“面孔识别单元”和“情景记录”对重复启动效应的解释相融合,可能比单独的任何一种理论更有助于解释这些结果。