Cappato Riccardo, Curnis Antonio, Marzollo Paolo, Mascioli Giosuè, Bordonali Tania, Beretti Sonia, Scalfi Fausto, Bontempi Luca, Carolei Adriana, Bardy Gust, De Ambroggi Luigi, Dei Cas Livio
Arrhythmias and Electrophysiology Center, Policlinico San Donato, University of Milan, Via Morandi 30, 20097 San Donato Milanese, Milan, Italy.
Eur Heart J. 2006 Mar;27(5):553-61. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehi654. Epub 2005 Dec 1.
There are few data on the outcomes of cardiac arrest (CA) victims when the defibrillation capability of broad rural and urban territories is fully operated by volunteers and laypersons.
In this study, we investigated whether a programme based on diffuse deployment of automated external defibrillators (AEDs) operated by 2186 trained volunteers and laypersons across the County of Brescia, Italy (area: 4826 km(2); population: 1 112 628), would safely and effectively impact the current survival among victims of out-of-hospital CA. Forty-nine AEDs were added to the former emergency medical system that uses manual EDs in the emergency department of 10 county hospitals and in five medically equipped ambulances. The primary endpoint was survival free of neurological impairment at 1-year follow-up. Data were analysed in 692 victims before and in 702 victims after the deployment of the AEDs. Survival increased from 0.9% (95% CI 0.4-1.8%) in the historical cohort to 3.0% (95% CI 1.7-4.3%) (P=0.0015), despite similar intervals from dispatch to arrival at the site of collapse [median (quartile range): 7 (4) min vs. 6 (6) min]. Increase of survival was noted both in the urban [from 1.4% (95% CI 0.4-3.4 %) to 4.0% (95% CI 2.0-6.9 %), P=0.024] and in the rural territory [from 0.5% (95% CI 0.1-1.6%) to 2.5% (95% CI 1.3-4.2%), P=0.013]. The additional costs per quality-adjusted life year saved amounted to euro39 388 (95% CI euro16 731-49 329) during the start-up phase of the study and to euro23 661 (95% CI euro10 327-35 528) at steady state.
Diffuse implementation of AEDs fully operated by trained volunteers and laypersons within a broad and unselected environment proved safe and was associated with a significantly higher long-term survival of CA victims.
关于在广大农村和城市地区,心脏骤停(CA)受害者的除颤能力完全由志愿者和非专业人员操作时的结局数据较少。
在本研究中,我们调查了一项基于在意大利布雷西亚县(面积:4826平方公里;人口:1112628)由2186名经过培训的志愿者和非专业人员分散部署自动体外除颤器(AED)的项目,是否会对院外心脏骤停受害者的当前生存率产生安全有效的影响。在前述使用手动除颤器的急救医疗系统基础上,在10家县级医院急诊科和5辆配备医疗设备的救护车中增加了49台AED。主要终点是1年随访时无神经功能障碍的生存率。对部署AED之前的692名受害者和之后的702名受害者的数据进行了分析。生存率从历史队列中的0.9%(95%置信区间0.4 - 1.8%)提高到了3.0%(95%置信区间1.7 - 4.3%)(P = 0.0015),尽管从调度到到达倒塌现场的间隔时间相似[中位数(四分位间距):7(4)分钟对6(6)分钟]。在城市地区[从1.4%(95%置信区间0.4 - 3.4%)提高到4.0%(95%置信区间2.0 - 6.9%),P = 0.024]和农村地区[从0.5%(95%置信区间0.1 - 1.6%)提高到2.5%(95%置信区间1.3 - 4.2%),P = 0.013]均观察到生存率的提高。在研究启动阶段,每挽救一个质量调整生命年的额外成本为39388欧元(95%置信区间16731 - 49329欧元),在稳定状态下为23661欧元(95%置信区间10327 - 35528欧元)。
在广泛且未经过筛选的环境中,由经过培训的志愿者和非专业人员全面操作AED的分散式实施被证明是安全的,并且与心脏骤停受害者显著更高的长期生存率相关。