Fu Jing, Olofsson Per
Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Malmö University Hospital, Lund University, S-205 02 Malmö, Sweden.
Early Hum Dev. 2006 Mar;82(3):211-6. doi: 10.1016/j.earlhumdev.2005.09.009. Epub 2005 Dec 2.
To investigate the cerebral circulatory response to superimposed acute hypoxemia in growth-restricted fetuses with established brain-sparing flow (BSF) during basal conditions.
76 term fetuses suspected of growth restriction were exposed to Doppler velocimetry in the umbilical artery (UA) and middle cerebral artery (MCA), and in 38-39 cases also in Galen's vein (GV), straight sinus (SS), and transverse sinus (TS), before and during an oxytocin challenge test (OCT), and simultaneous to electronic fetal heart rate monitoring. Nonparametric statistical analyses compared presence/absence of established BSF (MCA-to-UA pulsatility index [PI] ratio <1.08) with a two-tailed P<0.05 considered significant.
The OCT (positive/negative) was not different in the BSF group (BSFG, N=16) and the normal flow group (NFG, N=60) (P=0.2). During uterine contractions, the MCA PI decreased in the NFG, but not in the BSFG. De novo GV pulsations and increase of GV maximum flow velocity occurred during contractions in the NFG, but not in the BSFG. Significant SS flow velocity waveform changes were found in neither group and TS flow changes in the BSFG only.
Fetuses without established brain-sparing flow during basal conditions responded with both arterial and venous brain-sparing flow during acute hypoxemia, whereas in fetuses with established brain-sparing flow the cerebral circulatory responses were absent or equivocal. Fetuses with established brain-sparing flow may have a limited capacity of further cerebral hyperperfusion during superimposed acute hypoxic stress.
研究在基础状态下已建立脑保护血流(BSF)的生长受限胎儿对叠加急性低氧血症的脑循环反应。
76例疑似生长受限的足月胎儿在催产素激发试验(OCT)前及试验期间接受脐动脉(UA)和大脑中动脉(MCA)的多普勒测速检查,38 - 39例还接受了大脑大静脉(GV)、直窦(SS)和横窦(TS)的多普勒测速检查,并同步进行电子胎心监护。非参数统计分析比较已建立BSF(MCA与UA搏动指数[PI]比值<1.08)与否,双侧P<0.05为有统计学意义。
脑保护血流组(BSFG,N = 16)和正常血流组(NFG,N = 60)的OCT(阳性/阴性)无差异(P = 0.2)。子宫收缩期间,NFG组的MCA PI降低,而BSFG组未降低。NFG组在收缩期间出现新的GV搏动和GV最大流速增加,而BSFG组未出现。两组均未发现SS流速波形有显著变化,仅BSFG组发现TS血流有变化。
基础状态下未建立脑保护血流的胎儿在急性低氧血症时动脉和静脉均出现脑保护血流反应,而在已建立脑保护血流的胎儿中,脑循环反应不存在或不明确。已建立脑保护血流的胎儿在叠加急性缺氧应激时可能进一步脑过度灌注的能力有限。