McIlvain H E, McKinney M E, Thompson A V, Todd G L
Department of Family Practice, University of Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha 68198-5210.
Am J Prev Med. 1992 May-Jun;8(3):165-70.
The Multiple Risk Factor Intervention Trial (MRFIT) included a smoking cessation program that was highly successful (40.3% abstinence prevalence rate at 48-month follow-up) when used with other interventions for a male, middle-aged population at high risk for coronary heart disease (CHD). Our study employed the MRFIT cessation program alone with a mixed-sex, mixed-age, healthy population. We wished to determine its effectiveness when applied in a manner similar to other smoking cessation programs. Fifty-six subjects participated in a 10-week intervention followed by maintenance or extended intervention programs. The 52% abstinence prevalence rate at the end of the 10-week intervention dropped to 32% after four months, 25% at eight months, 25% at 12 months, and 27% at 16 months. The higher cessation rates of the original MRFIT study may be related to motivation and other characteristics of the high-risk population and to the combination of the smoking component with other interventions for CHD, rather than to the characteristics of the smoking intervention itself. Although the MRFIT program is comprehensive and includes vigorous maintenance activities, it is also expensive and may not be cost-effective or as desirable as programs with slightly lower cessation rates.
多重危险因素干预试验(MRFIT)包括一项戒烟计划,该计划在与其他干预措施一起用于患冠心病(CHD)风险较高的男性中年人群时非常成功(在48个月的随访中戒烟流行率为40.3%)。我们的研究仅对健康的混合性别、混合年龄人群采用了MRFIT戒烟计划。我们希望确定以与其他戒烟计划类似的方式应用该计划时的效果。56名受试者参加了为期10周的干预,随后是维持或延长干预计划。10周干预结束时52%的戒烟流行率在4个月后降至32%,8个月时为25%,12个月时为25%,16个月时为27%。最初MRFIT研究中较高的戒烟率可能与高危人群的动机和其他特征以及吸烟部分与其他冠心病干预措施的结合有关,而不是与吸烟干预本身的特征有关。尽管MRFIT计划很全面,包括积极的维持活动,但它也很昂贵,可能不具有成本效益,或者不如戒烟率略低的计划理想。