Hsu Yu-Pao, Chen Ray-Jade, Fang Jen-Feng, Lin Being-Chuan
Division of Trauma and Emergency Surgery, Surgical Department, Chang-Gung Memorial Hospital, Chang-Gung University, Taiwan, Republic of China.
Hepatogastroenterology. 2005 Nov-Dec;52(66):1752-8.
BACKGROUND/AIMS: Severe blunt torso trauma can cause diaphragmatic rupture. Such trauma remains a diagnostic challenge to the trauma surgeon, particularly when the initial chest roentgenogram is unrevealing. Owing to age, preexisting diseases, and poor physiological reserves, elderly patients suffer higher mortality rates after trauma than young patients. The difference between elderly and young patients in terms of blunt diaphragmatic rupture is particularly interesting.
Records from 78 patients presenting with blunt diaphragmatic rupture at our hospital from July 1992 to January 2001 were retrospectively reviewed. Age, gender, co-morbid disease, trauma mechanism, associated organ injury, injury severity score, hemodynamic status on arrival at our Emergency Room, injury side and size of diaphragmatic rupture, delay before operation, and postoperative complications and mortality were determined for elderly (> or = 65 years) and young (<65 years) patients.
10 elderly and 68 young patients were collected and reviewed. Elderly patients had higher rate of preexisting disease (60% vs. 16.2%), associated injury of long bone fracture (60% vs. 23%), and initial normal chest roentgenogram (50% vs. 12%) and they had significant delays before operation. Only 20% of elderly patients were operated on within 24 hours of trauma, compared to 87% of young patients, and 50% elderly patients were actually operated on over a week after the trauma. Furthermore, no statistically significant differences existed between elderly and young patients in ISS (19.9 +/- 6.3 & 22.8 +/- 10.4), or the injury side of diaphragmatic rupture, although elderly patients did display shorter diaphragmatic ruptures (5.6 +/- 3.3 & 10.0 +/- 6.0cm, p<0.05), and longer periods on postoperative ventilatory support (17.7 +/- 21.2 & 3.2 +/- 5.0 days, p<0.05). Finally, elderly patients also had significantly higher rates of postoperative complications of pneumonia (30% & 5.9%), and mortality (50% & 2.9%) than young patients did.
Compared to young patients, elderly patients with blunt diaphragmatic rupture had significantly higher rates of initial normal CXR, partly due to shorter length of diaphragmatic rupture, and partly due to ventilatory support, and consequent higher rate of delays before surgery. Furthermore, they also needed longer postoperative ventilator help, and prevailed higher rates of co-morbid disease, postoperative pneumonia, and mortality. Careful initial investigation and prudent radiological follow-up is recommended for elderly patients with severe blunt torso trauma.
背景/目的:严重钝性躯干创伤可导致膈肌破裂。此类创伤对创伤外科医生而言仍是一项诊断挑战,尤其是当初始胸部X线检查无异常发现时。由于年龄、基础疾病以及生理储备较差,老年患者创伤后的死亡率高于年轻患者。老年与年轻患者在钝性膈肌破裂方面的差异尤其值得关注。
回顾性分析1992年7月至2001年1月我院收治的78例钝性膈肌破裂患者的病历资料。确定老年(≥65岁)和年轻(<65岁)患者的年龄、性别、合并疾病、创伤机制、相关器官损伤、损伤严重程度评分、抵达急诊室时的血流动力学状态、膈肌破裂的部位和大小、手术延迟时间以及术后并发症和死亡率。
收集并分析了10例老年患者和68例年轻患者的资料。老年患者的基础疾病发生率较高(60%对16.2%)、合并长骨骨折损伤的比例较高(60%对23%)、初始胸部X线检查正常的比例较高(50%对12%),且手术前延迟时间较长。仅有20%的老年患者在创伤后24小时内接受手术,而年轻患者的这一比例为87%,50%的老年患者实际上是在创伤一周后才接受手术。此外,老年和年轻患者在损伤严重程度评分(19.9±6.3和22.8±10.4)或膈肌破裂的损伤侧别方面无统计学显著差异,尽管老年患者的膈肌破裂长度较短(5.6±3.3和10.0±6.0cm,p<0.05),术后机械通气支持时间较长(17.7±21.2和3.2±5.0天,p<0.05)。最后,老年患者术后肺炎并发症发生率(3对5.9%)和死亡率(50%对2.9%)也显著高于年轻患者。
与年轻患者相比,钝性膈肌破裂的老年患者初始胸部X线检查正常的比例显著更高,部分原因是膈肌破裂长度较短,部分原因是机械通气支持以及随之而来的手术前延迟时间较长。此外,他们术后还需要更长时间的机械通气支持,且基础疾病发生率、术后肺炎发生率和死亡率更高。对于严重钝性躯干创伤的老年患者,建议进行仔细的初始检查和谨慎的影像学随访。