Kataeva Irina, Chang Jessie, Xu Hao, Luan Chi-Hao, Zhou Jizhong, Uversky Vladimir N, Lin Dawei, Horanyi Peter, Liu Z J, Ljungdahl Lars G, Rose John, Luo Ming, Wang Bi-Cheng
Southeast Collaboratory for Structural Genomics, Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, University of Georgia, Athens, Georgia 30602, USA.
J Proteome Res. 2005 Nov-Dec;4(6):1942-51. doi: 10.1021/pr050108j.
Low solubility of proteins overexpressed in E. coli is a frequent problem in high-throughput structural genomics. To improve solubility of proteins from mesophilic Shewanella oneidensis MR-1 and thermophilic Clostridium thermocellum JW20, an approach was attempted that included a fusion of the target protein to a maltose-binding protein (MBP) and a decrease of induction temperature. The MBP was selected as the most efficient solubilizing carrier when compared to a glutathione S-transferase and a Nus A protein. A tobacco etch virus (TEV) protease recognition site was introduced between fused proteins using a double polymerase-chain reaction and four primers. In this way, 79 S. oneidensis proteins have been expressed in one case with an N-terminal 30-residue tag and in another case as a fusion protein with MBP. A foreign tag might significantly affect the properties of the target polypeptide. At 37 degrees C and 18 degrees C induction temperatures, only 5 and 17 tagged proteins were soluble, respectively. In fusion with MBP 4, 34, and 38 proteins were soluble upon induction at 37 degrees, 28 degrees, and 18 degrees C, respectively. The MBP is assumed to increase stability and solubility of a target protein by changing both the mechanism and the cooperativity of folding/unfolding. The 66 C. thermocellum proteins were expressed as fusion proteins with MBP. Induction at 37 degrees, 28 degrees, and 18 degrees C produced 34, 57, and 60 soluble proteins, respectively. The higher solubility of C. thermocellum proteins in comparison with the S. oneidensis proteins under similar conditions of induction correlates with the thermophilicity of the host. The two-factor Wilkinson-Harrison statistical model was used to identify soluble and insoluble proteins. Theoretical and experimental data showed good agreement for S. oneidensis proteins; however, the model failed to identify soluble/insoluble Clostridium proteins. A suggestion has been made that the Wilkinson-Harrison model is not applicable to C. thermocellum proteins because it did not account for the peculiarities of protein sequences from thermophiles.
在大肠杆菌中过表达的蛋白质溶解度低是高通量结构基因组学中经常遇到的问题。为了提高嗜温的希瓦氏菌MR-1和嗜热的热纤梭菌JW20中蛋白质的溶解度,尝试了一种方法,该方法包括将目标蛋白与麦芽糖结合蛋白(MBP)融合以及降低诱导温度。与谷胱甘肽S-转移酶和Nus A蛋白相比,MBP被选为最有效的增溶载体。使用双聚合酶链反应和四种引物在融合蛋白之间引入烟草蚀纹病毒(TEV)蛋白酶识别位点。通过这种方式,79种希瓦氏菌蛋白在一种情况下以N端30个残基的标签形式表达,在另一种情况下作为与MBP的融合蛋白表达。一个外源标签可能会显著影响目标多肽的性质。在37℃和18℃的诱导温度下,分别只有5种和17种带标签的蛋白是可溶的。与MBP融合时,在37℃、28℃和18℃诱导时分别有4种、34种和38种蛋白是可溶的。MBP被认为通过改变折叠/去折叠的机制和协同性来增加目标蛋白的稳定性和溶解度。66种热纤梭菌蛋白作为与MBP的融合蛋白表达。在37℃、28℃和18℃诱导分别产生34种、57种和60种可溶蛋白。在相似的诱导条件下,热纤梭菌蛋白比希瓦氏菌蛋白具有更高的溶解度,这与宿主的嗜热性相关。使用双因素威尔金森-哈里森统计模型来识别可溶和不可溶蛋白。理论和实验数据对希瓦氏菌蛋白显示出良好的一致性;然而,该模型未能识别热纤梭菌的可溶/不可溶蛋白。有人提出威尔金森-哈里森模型不适用于热纤梭菌蛋白,因为它没有考虑嗜热菌蛋白质序列的特殊性。