Van Gyseghem E, Dejaegher B, Put R, Forlay-Frick P, Elkihel A, Daszykowski M, Héberger K, Massart D L, Heyden Y Vander
Department of Analytical Chemistry and Pharmaceutical Technology, A VICIM Partner, Vrije Universiteit Brussel-VUB, Laarbeeklaan 103, B-1090 Brussels, Belgium.
J Pharm Biomed Anal. 2006 Apr 11;41(1):141-51. doi: 10.1016/j.jpba.2005.11.007. Epub 2005 Dec 13.
Several chemometric techniques were compared for their performance to determine the orthogonality and similarity between chromatographic systems. Pearson's correlation coefficient (r) based color maps earlier were used to indicate selectivity differences between systems. These maps, in which the systems were ranked according to decreasing or increasing dissimilarities observed in the weighted-average-linkage dendrogram, were now applied as reference method. A number of chemometric techniques were evaluated as potential alternative (visualization) methods for the same purpose. They include hierarchical clustering techniques (single, complete, unweighted-average-linkage, centroid and Ward's method), the Kennard and Stone algorithm, auto-associative multivariate regression trees (AAMRT), and the generalized pairwise correlation method (GPCM) with McNemar's statistical test. After all, the reference method remained our preferred technique to select orthogonal and identify similar systems.
比较了几种化学计量学技术在确定色谱系统之间的正交性和相似性方面的性能。早期基于皮尔逊相关系数(r)的彩色图谱被用于指示系统之间的选择性差异。这些图谱,其中系统根据在加权平均连锁树状图中观察到的差异的减小或增加进行排序,现在被用作参考方法。评估了许多化学计量学技术作为用于相同目的的潜在替代(可视化)方法。它们包括层次聚类技术(单链、完全链、非加权平均连锁、质心和沃德方法)、肯纳德和斯通算法、自关联多元回归树(AAMRT)以及带有麦克内马尔统计检验的广义成对相关方法(GPCM)。毕竟,参考方法仍然是我们选择正交系统和识别相似系统的首选技术。