Gao Fang, Melody Teresa, Daniels Darren F, Giles Simon, Fox Samantha
Critical Care Unit, Heart of England NHS Foundation Trust (Teaching), Birmingham Heartlands Hospital, Bordesley Green East, Birmingham B9 5SS, UK.
Crit Care. 2005;9(6):R764-70. doi: 10.1186/cc3909. Epub 2005 Nov 11.
Compliance with the ventilator care bundle affects the rate of ventilator-associated pneumonia. It was not known, however, whether compliance with sepsis care bundles has an impact on outcome. The aims of the present study were to determine the rate of compliance with 6-hour and 24-hour sepsis bundles and to determine the impact of the compliance on hospital mortality in patients with severe sepsis or septic shock.
We conducted a prospective observational study on 101 consecutive adult patients with severe sepsis or septic shock on medical or surgical wards, or in accident and emergency areas at two acute National Health Service Trust Teaching hospitals in England. The main outcome measures were: the rate of compliance with 6-hour and 24-hour sepsis care bundles adapted from the Surviving Sepsis Campaign guidelines on patients' clinical care; and the difference in hospital mortality between the compliant and the non-compliant groups.
The median age of the patients was 69 years (interquartile range 51 to 78), and 53% were male. The sources of infection were sought and confirmed in 87 of 101 patients. The chest was the most common source (50%), followed by the abdomen (22%). The rate of compliance with the 6-hour sepsis bundle was 52%. Compared with the compliant group, the non-compliant group had a more than twofold increase in hospital mortality (49% versus 23%, relative risk (RR) 2.12 (95% confidence interval (CI) 1.20 to 3.76), P = 0.01) despite similar age and severity of sepsis. Compliance with the 24-hour sepsis bundle was achieved in only 30% of eligible candidates (21/69). Hospital mortality was increased in the non-compliant group from 29% to 50%, with a 76% increase in risk for death, although the difference did not reach statistical significance (RR 1.76 (95% CI 0.84 to 3.64), P = 0.16).
Non-compliance with the 6-hour sepsis bundle was associated with a more than twofold increase in hospital mortality. Non-compliance with the 24-hour sepsis bundle resulted in a 76% increase in risk for hospital death. All medical staff should practise these relatively simple, easy and cheap bundles within a strict timeframe to improve survival rates in patients with severe sepsis and septic shock.
对呼吸机护理集束方案的依从性会影响呼吸机相关性肺炎的发生率。然而,对脓毒症护理集束方案的依从性是否会影响预后尚不清楚。本研究的目的是确定对6小时和24小时脓毒症集束方案的依从率,并确定依从性对严重脓毒症或脓毒性休克患者医院死亡率的影响。
我们对英格兰两家急性国民保健服务信托教学医院内科、外科病房或急症室的101例连续的严重脓毒症或脓毒性休克成年患者进行了一项前瞻性观察研究。主要结局指标为:根据拯救脓毒症运动临床护理指南改编的6小时和24小时脓毒症护理集束方案的依从率;依从组和不依从组之间的医院死亡率差异。
患者的中位年龄为69岁(四分位间距51至78岁),53%为男性。在101例患者中的87例中查找并确认了感染源。胸部是最常见的感染源(50%),其次是腹部(22%)。6小时脓毒症集束方案的依从率为52%。与依从组相比,不依从组的医院死亡率增加了两倍多(49%对23%,相对危险度(RR)2.12(95%置信区间(CI)1.20至3.76),P = 0.01),尽管两组患者的年龄和脓毒症严重程度相似。仅30%的符合条件的患者(21/69)实现了对24小时脓毒症集束方案的依从。不依从组的医院死亡率从29%增加到50%,死亡风险增加了76%,尽管差异未达到统计学意义(RR 1.76(95%CI 0.84至3.64),P = 0.16)。
不依从6小时脓毒症集束方案与医院死亡率增加两倍多相关。不依从24小时脓毒症集束方案导致医院死亡风险增加76%。所有医务人员应在严格的时间范围内实施这些相对简单、易行且成本低廉的集束方案,以提高严重脓毒症和脓毒性休克患者的生存率。