Bax Jeroen J, Abraham Theodore, Barold S Serge, Breithardt Ole A, Fung Jeffrey W H, Garrigue Stephane, Gorcsan John, Hayes David L, Kass David A, Knuuti Juhani, Leclercq Christophe, Linde Cecilia, Mark Daniel B, Monaghan Mark J, Nihoyannopoulos Petros, Schalij Martin J, Stellbrink Christophe, Yu Cheuk-Man
Department of Cardiology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands.
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2005 Dec 20;46(12):2153-67. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2005.09.019.
Cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) has been used extensively over the last years in the therapeutic management of patients with end-stage heart failure. Data from 4,017 patients have been published in eight large, randomized trials on CRT. Improvement in clinical end points (symptoms, exercise capacity, quality of life) and echocardiographic end points (systolic function, left ventricular size, mitral regurgitation) have been reported after CRT, with a reduction in hospitalizations for decompensated heart failure and an improvement in survival. However, individual results vary, and 20% to 30% of patients do not respond to CRT. At present, the selection criteria include severe heart failure (New York Heart Association functional class III or IV), left ventricular ejection fraction <35%, and wide QRS complex (>120 ms). Assessment of inter- and particularly intraventricular dyssynchrony as provided by echocardiography (predominantly tissue Doppler imaging techniques) may allow improved identification of potential responders to CRT. In this review a summary of the clinical and echocardiographic results of the large, randomized trials is provided, followed by an extensive overview on the currently available echocardiographic techniques for assessment of LV dyssynchrony. In addition, the value of LV scar tissue and venous anatomy for the selection of potential candidates for CRT are discussed.
在过去几年中,心脏再同步治疗(CRT)已广泛应用于终末期心力衰竭患者的治疗管理。关于CRT的八项大型随机试验发表了来自4017名患者的数据。据报道,CRT治疗后临床终点(症状、运动能力、生活质量)和超声心动图终点(收缩功能、左心室大小、二尖瓣反流)有所改善,因失代偿性心力衰竭住院次数减少,生存率提高。然而,个体结果存在差异,20%至30%的患者对CRT无反应。目前,选择标准包括严重心力衰竭(纽约心脏协会心功能分级III或IV级)、左心室射血分数<35%以及QRS波增宽(>120毫秒)。通过超声心动图(主要是组织多普勒成像技术)评估心室间尤其是心室内不同步,可能有助于更好地识别CRT的潜在反应者。在这篇综述中,提供了大型随机试验的临床和超声心动图结果总结,随后对目前可用的评估左心室不同步的超声心动图技术进行了广泛概述。此外,还讨论了左心室瘢痕组织和静脉解剖结构对选择CRT潜在候选者的价值。