Hantash Feras M, Redman Joy B, Starn Kelsey, Anderson Ben, Buller Arlene, McGinniss Matthew J, Quan Franklin, Peng Mei, Sun Weimin, Strom Charles M
Department of Molecular Genetics, Quest Diagnostics Nichols Institute, San Juan Capistrano, CA, USA.
Hum Genet. 2006 Mar;119(1-2):126-36. doi: 10.1007/s00439-005-0082-0. Epub 2005 Dec 17.
Because standard techniques used to detect mutations in the cystic fibrosis transmembrane conductance regulator (CFTR) gene do not detect single or multiple exonic rearrangements, the importance of such rearrangements may be underestimated. Using an in-house developed, single-tube, semi-quantitative fluorescent PCR (SQF PCR) assay, we analyzed 36 DNA samples submitted for extensive CFTR sequencing and identified ten samples with rearrangements. Of 36 patients with classic CF, 10 (28%) harbored various deletions in the CFTR gene, accounting for 14% of CF chromosomes. A deletion encompassing the CFTR promoter and exons 1 and 2 was detected in a sample from one proband, and in the maternal DNA as well. In another family, a deletion of the promoter and exon 1 was detected in three siblings. In both of these cases, the families were African American and the 3120+1G > A splice site mutation was also identified. These promoter deletions have not been previously described. In a third case, a deletion of exons 17a, 17b, and 18 was identified in a Caucasian female and the same mutation was detected in the paternal DNA. In the other seven cases, we identified the following deletions: exons 2 and 3 (n = 2); exons 4, 5, and 6a; exons 17a and 17b; exons 22 and 23; and exons 22, 23, and 24 (n = 2). In our series, the frequency of CFTR rearrangements in classic CF patients, when only one mutation was identified by extensive DNA sequencing, was >60% (10/16). Screening for exon deletions and duplications in the CFTR gene would be beneficial in classic CF cases, especially when only one mutation is identified by standard methodologies.
由于用于检测囊性纤维化跨膜传导调节因子(CFTR)基因突变的标准技术无法检测单个或多个外显子重排,此类重排的重要性可能被低估。我们使用自行开发的单管半定量荧光PCR(SQF PCR)检测方法,对36份提交进行CFTR基因全面测序的DNA样本进行了分析,共鉴定出10份存在重排的样本。在36例典型囊性纤维化患者中,10例(28%)的CFTR基因存在各种缺失,占CF染色体的14%。在一名先证者的样本及其母亲的DNA中均检测到一个包含CFTR启动子及外显子1和2的缺失。在另一个家族中,三名兄弟姐妹检测到启动子和外显子1缺失。在这两例中,家族均为非裔美国人,且均鉴定出3120+1G>A剪接位点突变。这些启动子缺失此前未见报道。在第三例中,一名白种女性检测到外显子17a、17b和18缺失,且在其父亲的DNA中检测到相同突变。在其他七例中,我们鉴定出以下缺失:外显子2和3(2例);外显子4、5和6a;外显子17a和17b;外显子22和23;以及外显子22、23和24(2例)。在我们的研究系列中,在经典囊性纤维化患者中,当通过全面DNA测序仅鉴定出一个突变时,CFTR重排的频率>60%(10/16)。对CFTR基因外显子缺失和重复进行筛查,对于经典囊性纤维化病例将是有益的,尤其是当通过标准方法仅鉴定出一个突变时。