Diehm Nicolas, Silvestro Antonio, Do Dai-Do, Greiner Richard, Triller Jürgen, Mahler Felix, Baumgartner Iris
Swiss Cardiovascular Center, Division of Angiology, Inselspital, University of Bern, Switzerland.
J Endovasc Ther. 2005 Dec;12(6):723-30. doi: 10.1583/05-1583MR.1.
To determine if the short-term efficacy of adjunctive endovascular brachytherapy (EVBT) is maintained over time in patients undergoing balloon angioplasty (BA) of femoropopliteal atherosclerotic lesions.
To evaluate the long-term clinical and angiographic outcome of EVBT, 147 consecutive patients (82 men; mean age 70.8+/-8.5 years) with 147 treated limbs were randomized to BA with (n=72, 49%) or without (n=75, 51%) adjunctive EVBT (12 or 14-Gy from an (192)Ir source, no centering, a 5-mm reference depth). Sixty-eight (46%) limbs were treated for de novo and 79 (54%) for recurrent femoropopliteal lesions. Clinical follow-up at 1, 3, 6, and 12 months and annually thereafter included evaluation of symptoms, ankle-brachial index (ABI), and intra-arterial angiography for new/worsening symptoms or at follow-up between 2 and 5 years. Sustained clinical success was defined as improvement in ABI >or=0.1 and/or of symptoms without repeated target lesion revascularization. Angiographic restenosis was defined as >or=50% diameter reduction. Subgroup analysis was performed for de novo versus recurrent lesions.
Mean clinical follow-up was 32.3+/-21.5 months. Angiographic follow-up was available in 83 (56%) patients (41 BA and 42 BA+EVBT) at a mean 31.8+/-20.7 months. Cumulative sustained clinical success rates at 1, 2, and 3 years, respectively, were 84.3%, 82.1%, and 76.4% after BA versus 82.4%, 69.8%, and 67.5% after BA+EVBT (p=0.26 by log-rank). Although the proportion of patients undergoing follow-up angiography was moderate, the freedom from angiographic restenosis at 1, 2, and 3 years was 70.7%, 63.1%, and 47.1% after BA versus 82.7%, 64.3%, and 64.3% after BA+EVBT (p=0.16 by log-rank). No differences were found between BA and BA+EVBT outcomes in patients with de novo versus recurrent femoropopliteal lesions.
The seemingly beneficial short-term effects of BA+EVBT are not sustained in the longer term, with no robust clinical improvement after angioplasty of atherosclerotic de novo or recurrent femoropopliteal lesions at up to 5 years.
确定在接受股腘动脉粥样硬化病变球囊血管成形术(BA)的患者中,辅助性血管内近距离放射治疗(EVBT)的短期疗效是否能长期维持。
为评估EVBT的长期临床和血管造影结果,将147例连续患者(82例男性;平均年龄70.8±8.5岁)的147条接受治疗的肢体随机分为接受(n = 72,49%)或不接受(n = 75,51%)辅助性EVBT(来自铱-192源的12或14 Gy,不进行中心定位,参考深度5 mm)的BA组。68条(46%)肢体为初发股腘动脉病变接受治疗,79条(54%)为复发性股腘动脉病变接受治疗。在1、3、6和12个月以及此后每年进行临床随访,包括评估症状、踝肱指数(ABI),以及针对新出现/加重的症状或在2至5年随访期间进行动脉内血管造影。持续临床成功定义为ABI改善≥0.1和/或症状改善且无需再次对靶病变进行血管重建。血管造影再狭窄定义为直径缩小≥50%。对初发病变与复发性病变进行亚组分析。
平均临床随访时间为32.3±21.5个月。83例(56%)患者(41例BA和42例BA + EVBT)可进行血管造影随访,平均随访时间为31.8±20.7个月。BA组在1年、2年和3年时的累积持续临床成功率分别为84.3%、82.1%和76.4%,而BA + EVBT组分别为82.4%、69.8%和67.5%(对数秩检验p = 0.26)。尽管接受随访血管造影的患者比例适中,但BA组在1年、2年和3年时无血管造影再狭窄的比例分别为70.7%、63.1%和47.1%,而BA + EVBT组分别为82.7%、64.3%和64.3%(对数秩检验p = 0.16)。在初发与复发性股腘动脉病变患者中,BA组和BA + EVBT组的结果未发现差异。
BA + EVBT看似有益的短期效果在长期内无法维持,在对初发或复发性股腘动脉粥样硬化病变进行血管成形术后长达5年的时间里,没有显著的临床改善。