Novellino Ettore, Cosimelli Barbara, Ehlardo Marina, Greco Giovanni, Iadanza Manuela, Lavecchia Antonio, Rimoli Maria Grazia, Sala Annalisa, Da Settimo Antonio, Primofiore Giampaolo, Da Settimo Federico, Taliani Sabrina, La Motta Concettina, Klotz Karl-Norbert, Tuscano Daniela, Trincavelli Maria Letizia, Martini Claudia
Dipartimento di Chimica Farmaceutica e Tossicologica, Università di Napoli "Federico II", Via D. Montesano, 49, 80131 Napoli, Italy. novellin.unima.it
J Med Chem. 2005 Dec 29;48(26):8253-60. doi: 10.1021/jm050792d.
The Cambridge Structural Database (CSD) was searched through two 3D queries based on substructures shared by well-known antagonists at the A(1) and A(3) adenosine receptors (ARs). Among the resulting 557 hits found in the CSD, we selected five compounds to purchase, synthesize, or translate synthetically into analogues better tailored to interact with the biological targets. Binding experiments using human ARs showed that four out of five tested compounds turned out to be antagonists at the A(1)AR or A(3)AR with K(i) values between 50 and 440 nM. Lead optimizations of 2-(benzimidazol-2-yl)quinoxalines (BIQs, 3) gave the best results in terms of potency and selectivity at the A(1) and A(3) ARs. Particularly, 2-(4-ethylthiobenzimidazol-2-yl)quinoxaline (3e) exhibited K(i) values at the A(1)AR, A(2A)AR, and A(3)AR of 0.5, 3440, and 955 nM, respectively, whereas 2-(4-methylbenzimidazol-2-yl)quinoxaline (3b) displayed at the same ARs K(i) values of 8000, 833, and 26 nM, respectively.
基于A(1)和A(3)腺苷受体(ARs)上知名拮抗剂共有的亚结构,通过两个三维查询在剑桥结构数据库(CSD)中进行搜索。在CSD中找到的557个命中结果中,我们选择了五种化合物进行购买、合成或合成转化为更适合与生物靶点相互作用的类似物。使用人ARs的结合实验表明,在测试的五种化合物中,有四种被证明是A(1)AR或A(3)AR的拮抗剂,其K(i)值在50至440 nM之间。2-(苯并咪唑-2-基)喹喔啉(BIQs,3)的先导优化在A(1)和A(3) ARs的效力和选择性方面取得了最佳结果。特别是,2-(4-乙硫基苯并咪唑-2-基)喹喔啉(3e)在A(1)AR、A(2A)AR和A(3)AR上的K(i)值分别为0.5、3440和955 nM,而2-(4-甲基苯并咪唑-2-基)喹喔啉(3b)在相同ARs上的K(i)值分别为8000、833和26 nM。