Suppr超能文献

接受抗菌饲料添加剂的生长仔猪体内大肠杆菌的敏感性

Susceptibility of Escherichia coli from growing piglets receiving antimicrobial feed additives.

作者信息

Kim L M, Gray Jeffery T, Harmon Barry G, Jones Richard D, Fedorka-Cray Paula J

机构信息

Bacterial Epidemiology and Antimicrobial Resistance Research Unit, USDA, ARS, Athens, Georgia 30605, USA.

出版信息

Foodborne Pathog Dis. 2005 Winter;2(4):304-16. doi: 10.1089/fpd.2005.2.304.

Abstract

Concerns regarding an apparent association between the use of antimicrobial feed additives (AFAs) in food animal production and a concomitant increase in antimicrobial drug resistance among zoonotic enteropathogens have provided the impetus to propose cessation of their use. While AFAs have been used in food animal production for nearly 50 years, the future use of AFAs will require an understanding of the effects of different classes of antimicrobials on the antimicrobial resistance of commensal flora. The present study examines the effect of three AFAs (apramycin, carbadox, and chlortetracycline) on the antimicrobial susceptibility of Escherichia coli in growing piglets and on animal performance. Three replicate trials were conducted using growing piglets fed standard diets with and without antimicrobial feed additives (AFAs). Fecal samples were cultured selectively for E. coli at regular intervals from all piglets from birth to market and antimicrobial susceptibility testing of E. coli isolates was performed using a replica-plate screening method and a broth microdilution method. While resistance to tetracycline in E. coli varied widely by sample, group, and trial, a significant increase in the percentage of resistant isolates was observed in piglets receiving AFAs when compared to controls (p < 0.0001). Resistance to apramycin increased in E. coli from piglets fed apramycin when compared to controls (p < 0.0001). However, upon removal of apramycin, resistance in E. coli declined to baseline levels by day 75. Piglets receiving AFAs demonstrated improved feed efficiency during phase 4 (p < 0.001), and higher average daily gains in phases 3 and 4 (p < 0.0001). This study suggests that antimicrobial resistance to AFAs in E. coli is drug-dependent and that some antimicrobials may be suitable for continued use in feeds during specified growth periods without concern for persistence of resistant E. coli populations.

摘要

对食用动物生产中使用抗菌饲料添加剂(AFAs)与动物肠道病原菌耐药性随之增加之间明显关联的担忧,促使人们提议停止使用这些添加剂。虽然AFAs已在食用动物生产中使用了近50年,但未来对AFAs的使用需要了解不同种类抗菌药物对共生菌群耐药性的影响。本研究考察了三种AFAs(阿普拉霉素、卡巴氧和金霉素)对生长猪大肠杆菌抗菌敏感性及动物生产性能的影响。使用生长猪进行了三项重复试验,分别饲喂添加和不添加抗菌饲料添加剂(AFAs)的标准日粮。从出生到上市,定期对所有仔猪的粪便样本进行大肠杆菌选择性培养,并使用复制平板筛选法和肉汤微量稀释法对分离出的大肠杆菌进行抗菌敏感性测试。虽然大肠杆菌对四环素的耐药性因样本、组和试验而异,但与对照组相比,接受AFAs的仔猪中耐药分离株的百分比显著增加(p<0.0001)。与对照组相比,饲喂阿普拉霉素的仔猪大肠杆菌对阿普拉霉素的耐药性增加(p<0.0001)。然而,去除阿普拉霉素后,大肠杆菌的耐药性在第75天降至基线水平。接受AFAs的仔猪在第4阶段饲料效率提高(p<0.001),在第3和第4阶段平均日增重更高(p<0.0001)。本研究表明,大肠杆菌对AFAs的耐药性取决于药物,并且某些抗菌药物可能适合在特定生长阶段继续用于饲料,而无需担心耐药大肠杆菌种群的持续存在。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验