Gnisci Augusto
Department of Psychology, Second University of Naples, Italy.
Br J Soc Psychol. 2005 Dec;44(Pt 4):621-43. doi: 10.1348/014466604X16363.
The aim of this research is to show the fruitfulness of a sequential analysis approach applied to the study of the dynamic and sequential character of accommodation strategies proposed by communication accommodation theory (CAT). It was applied to the convergence, divergence, maintenance, and control strategies undertaken in the courtroom during 47 hostile examinations from a single criminal case. Each of the 1,850 question-answer exchanges was classified for the content aspects (types of questions and of answers) and for the modalities of turn taking (interrupting, latching, and pausing) by both lawyer and witness. Log-linear analyses were performed. The main results show that the lawyer and the witness used both accommodation and maintenance strategies, even if the latter are used more by the lawyer. Both participants made use of unimodal and bimodal strategies and tended to reciprocate the behaviour of the interlocutor. The conclusions emphasize the advantage of using the sequential analysis approach to the accommodation strategies of CAT: studying multiple behaviours, identifying the direction and the modalities of the strategies even if they act simultaneously, and providing a means to evaluate the weight of the strategies on the whole and in detail.
本研究的目的是展示一种序列分析方法在研究交际顺应理论(CAT)提出的顺应策略的动态和序列特征方面的成效。该方法应用于对一个刑事案件中47次敌意询问期间法庭上所采用的趋同、趋异、维持和控制策略的研究。对1850次问答交流中的每一次,都从内容方面(问题和答案的类型)以及律师和证人轮流发言的方式(打断、衔接和停顿)进行了分类。进行了对数线性分析。主要结果表明,律师和证人都使用了顺应和维持策略,尽管律师更多地使用维持策略。双方参与者都采用了单峰和双峰策略,并且倾向于回应对方的行为。结论强调了使用序列分析方法研究CAT顺应策略的优势:研究多种行为,即使策略同时起作用也能识别其方向和方式,并提供一种手段来全面且详细地评估策略的权重。