Haraguchi N, Yamada Y
First Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Nagasaki University School of Dentistry, Japan.
Arch Oral Biol. 1992;37(6):451-8. doi: 10.1016/0003-9969(92)90099-t.
Masseter and digastric muscle activities and jaw movement trajectories were recorded in freely moving rabbits during eating. The patterns in these trajectories and activities were similar to those described in previous studies on restrained animals. Although the duration of masticatory sequences, which started with food intake followed by grinding movements and ended by swallowing, varied, the total number of chewing cycles in a chain of masticatory sequences was consistent (1043 +/- 51, mean +/- SD; n = 5, for chow pellets) among the animals tested. When animals ate hard foods, extra bursts in the digastric electromyograms occurred frequently in the jaw-closing phase. The digastric activities were rather short (6.1 +/- 1.0 ms; n = 100) and the amplitude of these digastric short bursts (DSBs) was much larger (1.69 +/- 0.81 mV; n = 100) than in the opening phase (0.56 +/- 0.33 mV; n = 100), which actually depressed the jaw. When a soft food (bread) was tested, this activity was not observed. The proportion of occurrences of the DSB in a chewing cycle was high at the slow-closing phase, indicating that the DSBs were due to tooth contacts during food crushing. Of 1035 chewing cycles examined in the five animals, 124 were associated with a DSB and 415 cycles with a masseter inhibitory period (MIP). The proportion of the occurrences of the MIP was significantly larger than that of the DSBs. Of 124 DSBs, 85 (68.5 per cent) coincided with an MIP. Four were not associated with clear MIPs, although there was masseter activity at the time of the DSBs. The other 35 DSBs were out of phase with the masseter bursts, although still in a closing phase. The durations of the MIPs accompanied by a DSB were significantly longer than those not so associated. The DSB may be a reflex response mediated by periodontal mechanoreceptors when the upper and lower teeth come together while chewing hard food. The reflex arc for the DSB may be independent of that for the MIP, and the threshold for the DSB may be higher.
在自由活动的兔子进食过程中,记录了咬肌和二腹肌的活动以及下颌运动轨迹。这些轨迹和活动中的模式与先前对受限动物的研究中所描述的相似。尽管咀嚼序列的持续时间各不相同,其始于食物摄入,接着是研磨动作,最后以吞咽结束,但在受试动物中,一连串咀嚼序列中的咀嚼周期总数是一致的(对于兔粮颗粒,为1043±51,平均值±标准差;n = 5)。当动物食用硬质食物时,二腹肌肌电图中的额外爆发在闭口阶段频繁出现。二腹肌活动相当短暂(6.1±1.0毫秒;n = 100),并且这些二腹肌短爆发(DSB)的幅度比开口阶段(0.56±0.33毫伏;n = 100)大得多(1.69±0.81毫伏;n = 100),而开口阶段实际上会使下颌下压。当测试软质食物(面包)时,未观察到这种活动。在咀嚼周期的慢闭口阶段,DSB出现的比例较高,这表明DSB是由于食物碾碎过程中的牙齿接触所致。在这五只动物中检查的1035个咀嚼周期中,124个与DSB相关,415个周期与咬肌抑制期(MIP)相关。MIP出现的比例明显大于DSB。在124个DSB中,85个(68.5%)与MIP同时出现。有4个与明确的MIP无关,尽管在DSB出现时存在咬肌活动。另外35个DSB与咬肌爆发不同步,尽管仍处于闭口阶段。伴有DSB的MIP持续时间明显长于不伴有DSB的MIP。DSB可能是在咀嚼硬质食物时上下牙齿咬合时由牙周机械感受器介导的一种反射反应。DSB反射弧可能独立于MIP反射弧,并且DSB的阈值可能更高。