How Google is changing medicine.
作者信息
Giustini Dean
出版信息
BMJ. 2005 Dec 24;331(7531):1487-8. doi: 10.1136/bmj.331.7531.1487.
Abstract
摘要
相似文献
1
How Google is changing medicine.
BMJ. 2005 Dec 24;331(7531):1487-8. doi: 10.1136/bmj.331.7531.1487.
2
Dental informatics: a new career in dentistry.
Pa Dent J (Harrisb). 2000 Nov-Dec;67(6):31-2, 46-8.
3
Digital doctoring 2002.
Manag Care Interface. 2001 Jul;14(7):32-4.
4
eHealth and the future: promise or peril?
BMJ. 2005 Dec 10;331(7529):1391-3. doi: 10.1136/bmj.331.7529.1391.
5
A Google for clinical trials.
Can J Cardiol. 2004 Oct;20(12):1194.
6
[From textbook to Internet].
Ugeskr Laeger. 2000 Jan 3;162(1):76-7.
7
Internet use by dermatology outpatients to search for health information.
Int J Dermatol. 2011 Mar;50(3):292-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-4632.2010.04705.x.
8
GIMI: the past, the present and the future.
Philos Trans A Math Phys Eng Sci. 2010 Aug 28;368(1925):3891-905. doi: 10.1098/rsta.2010.0153.
9
Googling your treatment for analgesia in labour.
BMJ. 2006 Apr 1;332(7544):795. doi: 10.1136/bmj.332.7544.795-c.
10
Measuring the readership of a health-related Website.
J Telemed Telecare. 2000;6 Suppl 2:S2-5.
引用本文的文献
1
Diagnosis in Bytes: Comparing the Diagnostic Accuracy of Google and ChatGPT 3.5 as an Educational Support Tool.
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2024 May 1;21(5):580. doi: 10.3390/ijerph21050580.
2
A mixed methods study on medicines information needs and challenges in New Zealand general practice.
BMC Fam Pract. 2021 Jul 10;22(1):150. doi: 10.1186/s12875-021-01451-7.
3
Examining the use of an open digital health library for professionals.
JMIR Res Protoc. 2014 Nov 18;3(4):e66. doi: 10.2196/resprot.3820.
4
An information retrieval system for computerized patient records in the context of a daily hospital practice: the example of the Léon Bérard Cancer Center (France).
Appl Clin Inform. 2014 Mar 5;5(1):191-205. doi: 10.4338/ACI-2013-08-CR-0065. eCollection 2014.
5
The comparative recall of Google Scholar versus PubMed in identical searches for biomedical systematic reviews: a review of searches used in systematic reviews.
Syst Rev. 2013 Dec 23;2:115. doi: 10.1186/2046-4053-2-115.
6
Factors contributing to lack of interest in research among medical students.
Adv Med Educ Pract. 2013 Nov 7;4:237-43. doi: 10.2147/AMEP.S51536. eCollection 2013.
7
Retrieving clinical evidence: a comparison of PubMed and Google Scholar for quick clinical searches.
J Med Internet Res. 2013 Aug 15;15(8):e164. doi: 10.2196/jmir.2624.
8
Google Scholar is not enough to be used alone for systematic reviews.
Online J Public Health Inform. 2013 Jul 1;5(2):214. doi: 10.5210/ojphi.v5i2.4623. Print 2013.
9
Reiki and related therapies in the dialysis ward: an evidence-based and ethical discussion to debate if these complementary and alternative medicines are welcomed or banned.
BMC Nephrol. 2013 Jun 21;14:129. doi: 10.1186/1471-2369-14-129.
10
Is the coverage of Google Scholar enough to be used alone for systematic reviews.
BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2013 Jan 9;13:7. doi: 10.1186/1472-6947-13-7.
本文引用的文献
1
. . . And a diagnostic test was performed.
N Engl J Med. 2005 Nov 10;353(19):2089-90. doi: 10.1056/NEJM200511103531923.
2
Google Scholar: A source for clinicians?
CMAJ. 2005 Jun 7;172(12):1549-50. doi: 10.1503/cmaj.050404.
3
2015--the future of medical libraries.
N Engl J Med. 2005 Mar 17;352(11):1067-70. doi: 10.1056/NEJMp048190.
4
Why do residents fail to answer their clinical questions? A qualitative study of barriers to practicing evidence-based medicine.
Acad Med. 2005 Feb;80(2):176-82. doi: 10.1097/00001888-200502000-00016.
Zotero 插件