• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

未能发挥自身生长潜力的胎儿,其产科和新生儿结局会更差吗?

Is obstetric and neonatal outcome worse in fetuses who fail to reach their own growth potential?

作者信息

Danielian P J, Allman A C, Steer P J

机构信息

Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Charing Cross and Westminster Medical School, West London Hospital, UK.

出版信息

Br J Obstet Gynaecol. 1992 Jun;99(6):452-4. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-0528.1992.tb13779.x.

DOI:10.1111/j.1471-0528.1992.tb13779.x
PMID:1637757
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

To determine the perinatal outcome of fetuses who had birthweights less than that expected from early third trimester ultrasound scanning.

DESIGN

Retrospective estimation of centile fetal weight at early third trimester ultrasound scanning compared with actual centile birthweight corrected for gestational age, parity and sex.

SETTING

Teaching Hospital Obstetric Unit, London.

SUBJECTS

197 unselected women with singleton cephalic pregnancies who were delivered at term in our unit between October 1989 and May 1990.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

CTG abnormality, need for fetal blood sampling in labour, meconium-staining of the amniotic fluid, mode of delivery, Apgar scores at 1 and 5 min, need for transfer of baby to neonatal unit, and need for neonatal intubation of the neonate at delivery.

RESULTS

An actual birthweight greater than 5% less than the birthweight estimated from ultrasound scanning identified 44 babies (22%) with an increased risk of CTG abnormalities (chi 2 = 8.38, P less than 0.0025; Odds ratio (OR) = 2.54; 95% CI 1.36 to 4.78) and need for operative delivery (chi 2 = 5.81, P less than 0.0125; OR = 1.94; 95% CI 1.15 to 3.27), when compared with the remainder of the sample. Overall 14 (32%) of this group had birthweights above the 50th centile. A group of 44 babies selected as being the smallest for gestational age, without reference to growth pattern, had a similar excess morbidity. (All this group had birthweights below the 39th centile).

CONCLUSIONS

This study supports the hypothesis that in-utero fetal growth pattern is as important for perinatal outcome as being small for gestational age per se.

摘要

目的

确定出生体重低于孕晚期超声扫描预期的胎儿的围产期结局。

设计

回顾性评估孕晚期超声扫描时胎儿体重百分位数,并与根据孕周、产次和性别校正后的实际出生体重百分位数进行比较。

地点

伦敦教学医院产科病房。

研究对象

1989年10月至1990年5月在我院足月分娩的197例单胎头位妊娠未选择的妇女。

主要观察指标

CTG异常、产时胎儿血样采集需求、羊水胎粪污染、分娩方式、1分钟和5分钟Apgar评分、婴儿转入新生儿病房的需求以及分娩时新生儿气管插管的需求。

结果

实际出生体重比超声扫描估计的出生体重低5%以上,共识别出44例婴儿(22%),与样本其余部分相比,这些婴儿发生CTG异常的风险增加(χ² = 8.38,P < 0.0025;优势比(OR) = 2.54;95%可信区间1.36至4.78),且需要手术分娩(χ² = 5.81,P < 0.0125;OR = 1.94;95%可信区间1.15至3.27)。总体而言,该组中有14例(32%)出生体重高于第50百分位数。一组44例被选为孕周最小的婴儿,未考虑生长模式,其发病率也有类似增加。(该组所有婴儿出生体重均低于第39百分位数)。

结论

本研究支持以下假设,即宫内胎儿生长模式对围产期结局的重要性与孕周小本身相当。

相似文献

1
Is obstetric and neonatal outcome worse in fetuses who fail to reach their own growth potential?未能发挥自身生长潜力的胎儿,其产科和新生儿结局会更差吗?
Br J Obstet Gynaecol. 1992 Jun;99(6):452-4. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-0528.1992.tb13779.x.
2
Are babies of normal birth weight who fail to reach their growth potential as diagnosed by ultrasound at increased risk?出生体重正常但经超声诊断未达到其生长潜能的婴儿是否处于更高风险中?
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 1995 Feb;5(2):114-8. doi: 10.1046/j.1469-0705.1995.05020114.x.
3
Term small-for-gestational-age infants from low-risk women are at significantly greater risk of adverse neonatal outcomes.来自低危孕妇的小于胎龄儿有显著更大的不良新生儿结局风险。
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2018 May;218(5):525.e1-525.e9. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2018.02.008. Epub 2018 Feb 17.
4
The fetal outcome in pregnancies with isolated reduced amniotic fluid volume in the third trimester.孕晚期单纯羊水过少妊娠的胎儿结局
J Perinat Med. 1998;26(5):390-5. doi: 10.1515/jpme.1998.26.5.390.
5
Timing of delivery and neonatal outcomes for small-for-gestational-age fetuses.小于胎龄儿的分娩时机与新生儿结局
J Ultrasound Med. 2014 Oct;33(10):1721-8. doi: 10.7863/ultra.33.10.1721.
6
Reduced growth velocity across the third trimester is associated with placental insufficiency in fetuses born at a normal birthweight: a prospective cohort study.孕晚期生长速度减慢与出生体重正常胎儿的胎盘功能不全有关:一项前瞻性队列研究。
BMC Med. 2017 Aug 31;15(1):164. doi: 10.1186/s12916-017-0928-z.
7
Is cerebroplacental ratio a marker of impaired fetal growth velocity and adverse pregnancy outcome?脑-胎盘比值是否是胎儿生长速度受损和不良妊娠结局的标志物?
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2017 Jun;216(6):606.e1-606.e10. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2017.02.005. Epub 2017 Feb 8.
8
Prediction of perinatal morbidity at term in small fetuses: comparison of fetal growth and Doppler ultrasound.足月小样儿围产期发病率的预测:胎儿生长与多普勒超声的比较
Br J Obstet Gynaecol. 1994 May;101(5):422-7. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-0528.1994.tb11916.x.
9
Prediction of adverse perinatal outcome by cerebroplacental ratio adjusted for estimated fetal weight.通过校正估计胎儿体重的脑胎盘比值预测不良围产结局。
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2018 Mar;51(3):381-386. doi: 10.1002/uog.17458. Epub 2018 Feb 7.
10
Impact on obstetric outcome of third-trimester screening for small-for-gestational-age fetuses.孕晚期筛查小于胎龄儿对产科结局的影响。
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2015 Aug;46(2):216-20. doi: 10.1002/uog.14755. Epub 2015 Jul 6.

引用本文的文献

1
Risk factors for a serious adverse outcome in neonates: a retrospective cohort study of vaginal births.新生儿严重不良结局的危险因素:阴道分娩的回顾性队列研究。
BJOG. 2023 Nov;130(12):1521-1530. doi: 10.1111/1471-0528.17531. Epub 2023 May 8.
2
Defining normal and abnormal fetal growth: promises and challenges.定义正常和异常胎儿生长:承诺与挑战。
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2010 Jun;202(6):522-8. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2009.10.889. Epub 2010 Jan 13.
3
Downward percentile crossing as an indicator of an adverse prenatal environment.百分位数下降作为不良产前环境的一个指标。
Ann Hum Biol. 2008 Sep-Oct;35(5):462-74. doi: 10.1080/03014460802311062.
4
Confined placental mosaicism and intrauterine fetal growth.局限性胎盘嵌合体与宫内胎儿生长
Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed. 1998 Nov;79(3):F223-6. doi: 10.1136/fn.79.3.f223.
5
Rituals in antenatal care--do we need them?产前护理中的仪式——我们需要它们吗?
BMJ. 1993 Sep 18;307(6906):697-8. doi: 10.1136/bmj.307.6906.697.