Cheung Arnold, Telaghani Christopher K, Wang Jianli, Yang Qing, Mosher Timothy J, Reichwein Raymond K, Cockroft Kevin M
Department of Neurological Surgery, Pennsylvania State University College of Medicine, M. S. Hershey Medical Center, Hershey, PA 17033, USA.
Neurocrit Care. 2005;3(3):216-23. doi: 10.1385/NCC:3:3:216.
Decompressive craniectomy has demonstrated efficacy in reducing morbidity and mortality in critically ill patients with massive hemispheric cerebral infarction. However, little is known about the patterns of functional recovery that exist in patients after decompressive craniectomy, and controversy still exists as to whether craniotomy and infarct resection ("strokectomy") are appropriate alternatives to decompression alone. We therefore used functional magnetic resonance imaging (f-MRI) to assess the extent and location of functional recovery in patients after decompressive craniectomy for massive ischemic stroke.
f-MRI was obtained in three patients with massive nondominant cerebral infarction who had undergone decompressive craniectomy for severe cerebral edema 13 to 26 months previously. Brain activation was triggered by hand-gripping or foot- movement tasks. Imaging results were combined with periodic clinical follow-up to determine the extent of neurological recovery.
Activation of the contralateral hemisphere was seen in the sensorimotor cortex, premotor, and supplementary motor areas. Lesser activation patterns were seen in equivalent regions of the infarcted hemisphere. Peri-infarct activation foci were seen in two of the three patients, but no activation occurred within the area of infarction as defined by the initial stroke seen on diffusion-weighted MRI. All three patients demonstrated some corresponding neurological improvement.
After massive hemispheric cerebral infarction requiring decompressive craniectomy, patients may experience functional recovery as a result of activation in both the infarcted and contralateral hemispheres. The evidence of functional recovery in peri-infarct regions suggests that decompression alone may be preferable to strokectomy where the risk of damage to adjacent nonischemic brain may be greater.
减压性颅骨切除术已被证明可有效降低大面积半球性脑梗死危重病患者的发病率和死亡率。然而,对于减压性颅骨切除术后患者的功能恢复模式知之甚少,并且对于开颅和梗死灶切除术(“卒中切除术”)是否是单纯减压的合适替代方案仍存在争议。因此,我们使用功能磁共振成像(f-MRI)来评估大面积缺血性卒中减压性颅骨切除术后患者功能恢复的程度和位置。
对3例大面积非优势脑梗死患者进行f-MRI检查,这些患者在13至26个月前因严重脑水肿接受了减压性颅骨切除术。通过手部抓握或足部运动任务触发脑激活。将成像结果与定期临床随访相结合,以确定神经功能恢复的程度。
在感觉运动皮层、运动前区和辅助运动区观察到对侧半球的激活。在梗死半球的等效区域观察到较少的激活模式。在3例患者中的2例中观察到梗死灶周围激活灶,但在扩散加权MRI上最初显示的卒中所定义的梗死区域内未发生激活。所有3例患者均表现出一定程度的相应神经功能改善。
在需要进行减压性颅骨切除术的大面积半球性脑梗死之后,患者可能会由于梗死半球和对侧半球的激活而出现功能恢复。梗死灶周围区域功能恢复的证据表明,在对相邻非缺血性脑造成损伤的风险可能更大的情况下,单纯减压可能比卒中切除术更可取。