Mata Astolfo J, Caloin Michel, Robin Jean-Patrice, Le Maho Yvon
Centre d'Ecologie et Physiologie Energetiques, Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique-Unite Propre de Recherche 9010, 23 rue Becquerel, F-67087 Strasbourg, Cedex 2, France.
Physiol Biochem Zool. 2006 Jan-Feb;79(1):202-9. doi: 10.1086/498354. Epub 2005 Nov 28.
Body composition in birds was evaluated indirectly by 18O and 2H dilution. Body composition was determined by whole-body chemical analysis of eight adult roosters (Gallus gallus). In vivo measurements of total body water (TBW) were carried out using doubly labeled water (2H2 18O). Estimated dilution spaces using both the plateau and intercept approaches were compared with the results obtained by carcass lyophilization. Both 18O and 2H slightly overestimated TBW compared with the results obtained by lyophilization, by 2.2%+/-1.9% and 5.7%+/-0.2%, respectively; both differences were statistically significant (P<0.01). The difference between these isotope estimations was significant (P<0.001). However, isotope dilution spaces and TBW were highly correlated. There was a strong inverse relationship between total body fat and TBW percentages (r2=0.98, P<0.0001). The relation between TBW and body protein was significant. Water content in lean body mass (72.8%) obtained in our study was very close to that reported in mammals, demonstrating no fundamental difference in tissue water content between birds and mammals. Estimated body fat and protein values from isotopic dilution did not significantly differ from values obtained by direct chemical analysis (P>0.05), except for body fat in the Pace and Rathbun approach (Table 3). Although estimation of TBW and body composition by isotope dilution is time consuming and expensive, deuterium offers a reliable and low-cost alternative compared with 18O. The advantage of in vivo estimation of TBW with isotopic dilution in combination with the regression approach is that it permits repeated measurements of body composition on the same birds under laboratory and free-living conditions.
通过18O和2H稀释法间接评估鸟类的身体组成。通过对八只成年公鸡(原鸡)进行全身化学分析来确定身体组成。使用双标记水(2H2 18O)对全身水(TBW)进行体内测量。将使用平台法和截距法估计的稀释空间与通过胴体冻干获得的结果进行比较。与冻干结果相比,18O和2H对TBW的估计均略有高估,分别高估了2.2%±1.9%和5.7%±0.2%;这两个差异均具有统计学意义(P<0.01)。这些同位素估计值之间的差异具有显著性(P<0.001)。然而,同位素稀释空间与TBW高度相关。全身脂肪百分比与TBW百分比之间存在很强的负相关关系(r2=0.98,P<0.0001)。TBW与身体蛋白质之间的关系显著。我们研究中获得的瘦体重水含量(72.8%)与哺乳动物报道的非常接近,表明鸟类和哺乳动物在组织水含量方面没有根本差异。除了Pace和Rathbun方法中的身体脂肪外,通过同位素稀释估计的身体脂肪和蛋白质值与直接化学分析获得的值没有显著差异(P>0.05)(表3)。尽管通过同位素稀释估计TBW和身体组成既耗时又昂贵,但与18O相比,氘提供了一种可靠且低成本的替代方法。在体内用同位素稀释结合回归方法估计TBW的优点是,它允许在实验室和自由生活条件下对同一只鸟重复测量身体组成。