Oliveira A D, Oliveira C
Departamento de Protecção Radiológica e Segurança Nuclear, Instituto Tecnológico e Nuclear, EN 10, Apartado 21, 2686-953 Sacavem, Portugal.
Radiat Prot Dosimetry. 2005;115(1-4):254-7. doi: 10.1093/rpd/nci187.
In shielding calculation, deterministic methods have some advantages and also some disadvantages relative to other kind of codes, such as Monte Carlo. The main advantage is the short computer time needed to find solutions while the disadvantages are related to the often-used build-up factor that is extrapolated from high to low energies or with unknown geometrical conditions, which can lead to significant errors in shielding results. The aim of this work is to investigate how good are some deterministic methods to calculating low-energy shielding, using attenuation coefficients and build-up factor corrections. Commercial software MicroShield 5.05 has been used as the deterministic code while MCNP has been used as the Monte Carlo code. Point and cylindrical sources with slab shield have been defined allowing comparison between the capability of both Monte Carlo and deterministic methods in a day-by-day shielding calculation using sensitivity analysis of significant parameters, such as energy and geometrical conditions.
在屏蔽计算中,与其他类型的程序(如蒙特卡罗程序)相比,确定性方法有一些优点,也有一些缺点。主要优点是找到解决方案所需的计算机时间短,而缺点与通常使用的积累因子有关,该因子是从高能外推到低能或在未知几何条件下得出的,这可能导致屏蔽结果出现重大误差。这项工作的目的是研究一些确定性方法在使用衰减系数和积累因子校正来计算低能屏蔽方面的效果如何。商业软件MicroShield 5.05已被用作确定性程序,而MCNP已被用作蒙特卡罗程序。已定义了带有平板屏蔽的点源和柱形源,以便通过对能量和几何条件等重要参数进行敏感性分析,在日常屏蔽计算中比较蒙特卡罗方法和确定性方法的能力。