Pastore Carlos Alberto, Tobias Nancy, Samesima Nelson, Filho Martino Martinelli, Pedrosa Anisio, Nishioka Silvana, Douglas Roberto A, Moreira Luís Felipe, Ramires José Franchini
Heart Institute (InCor) of the University of São Paulo Medical School, Brazil.
J Electrocardiol. 2006 Jan;39(1):93-102. doi: 10.1016/j.jelectrocard.2005.07.004. Epub 2005 Dec 1.
Body surface potential mapping assessed mean cardiac electrical activation times displayed by isochronal maps in the right ventricle (RV; right ventricle mean activation time [mRV]), anterior septal area (anterior septal area mean activation time [mAS]), and left ventricle (left ventricle mean activation time [mLV]) of 28 patients (mean, 61.07 years; congestive heart failure class III-IV; ejection fraction, < or =40%; left bundle-branch block [LBBB] QRS, 180.17 milliseconds), before and after biventricular pacemaker implantation, comparing them, using reference values from a control group of healthy individuals with normal hearts (GNL), in (1) baseline native LBBB, where mRV and mAS values were similar (40.99 vs 43.62 milliseconds), with mLV delayed (80.99 milliseconds, P < .01) and dyssynchronous with RV/anterior septal area; (2) single-site RV pacing, where mRV was greater than in GNL (86.82 milliseconds, P < .001), with greater mAS/mLV difference (63.41 vs 102.7 milliseconds; P < .001); and (3) biventricular pacing (BIV-PM), where mLV and mRV were similar (71.99 vs 71.58 milliseconds), mRV was greater than in GNL and native LBBB (71.58 vs 35.1 and 40.99 milliseconds; P < .001), and mAS approached values in GNL and native LBBB (51.28 vs 50.14 and 43.62 milliseconds). Body surface potential mapping showed that similar RV/left ventricle activation times during biventricular pacing, nearing mAS, indicate synchronized ventricular activation pattern in patients with congestive heart failure/LBBB.
体表电位标测评估了28例患者(平均61.07岁;纽约心功能分级III - IV级;射血分数≤40%;左束支传导阻滞[LBBB],QRS时限180.17毫秒)在双心室起搏器植入前后右心室(RV;右心室平均激动时间[mRV])、前间隔区域(前间隔区域平均激动时间[mAS])和左心室(左心室平均激动时间[mLV])的平均心脏电激动时间,将其与正常心脏的健康个体对照组(GNL)的参考值进行比较,情况如下:(1)基线时的原发性LBBB,此时mRV和mAS值相似(40.99对43.62毫秒),mLV延迟(80.99毫秒,P <.01)且与右心室/前间隔区域不同步;(2)单部位右心室起搏,此时mRV大于GNL组(86.82毫秒,P <.001),mAS/mLV差值更大(63.41对102.7毫秒;P <.001);(3)双心室起搏(BIV - PM),此时mLV和mRV相似(71.99对71.58毫秒),mRV大于GNL组和原发性LBBB时的值(71.58对35.1和40.99毫秒;P <.001),且mAS接近GNL组和原发性LBBB时的值(51.28对50.14和43.62毫秒)。体表电位标测显示,双心室起搏期间右心室/左心室激动时间相似,接近mAS,这表明充血性心力衰竭/LBBB患者的心室激动模式同步。