Dermatas D, Shen G, Chrysochoou M, Grubb D G, Menounou N, Dutko P
WM Keck Geoenvironmental Laboratory, Center for Environmental Systems, Stevens Institute of Technology, Hoboken, NJ 07030, USA.
J Hazard Mater. 2006 Aug 10;136(1):34-46. doi: 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2005.11.009. Epub 2006 Jan 18.
A series of soil parameter and mineralogical investigative techniques were applied to assess the Pb speciation in four US Army firing range soils that presented significantly different Pb leaching regimes and soil characteristics. Soil gradation tests were complemented by total chemical analyses, X-ray powder diffraction (XRPD), Rietveld quantification, optical microscopy and scanning electron microscopy (SEM) analyses. The bulk geotechnical, mineralogical and chemical analyses pointed to two possible Pb retention mechanisms: precipitation as lead carbonate and sorption in the case of fine-grained soils. Lead speciation and mobility was further investigated by the toxicity characteristic leaching procedure (TCLP) and sequential extraction test (SET). As the TCLP Pb concentrations did not necessarily reflect the total Pb analysis of the soils, the Pb leachability ratio (TCLP/total) was found to be controlled by soil mineralogy and its response to changes in system pH. Geochemical modeling, using Visual MINTEQ, was employed to evaluate the mechanisms that controlled the observed TCLP Pb leaching behavior. It was found that lead carbonate precipitation/dissolution reactions controlled Pb TCLP leachability in all soils, while sorptive phenomena did not seem to play a role even in the case of fine-grained soils. More specifically, TCLP Pb leachability was controlled by the pH, the available Pb and the available carbonate in solution. This indicates that geochemical modeling strongly complimented TCLP Pb analyses. Thus, geochemical modeling is an important assessment tool to evaluate the magnitude of site-specific Pb-related environmental problems in firing range soils. Carbonation reactions, involving metallic Pb, that occur during the SET obscure its ability to reliably ascertain Pb speciation. More specifically, SET lumps the extractable Pb into predetermined phase categories that may not be truly representative of the actual soil mineralogy or dominant forms of Pb in the soil. A thorough geotechnical, mineralogical and chemical investigation of firing range soils, complemented by geochemical modeling, was therefore found to be a more reliable approach to evaluate Pb speciation and TCLP release in firing range soils.
一系列土壤参数和矿物学研究技术被用于评估美国陆军四个靶场土壤中的铅形态,这些土壤呈现出显著不同的铅淋溶情况和土壤特性。土壤级配试验辅以全化学分析、X射线粉末衍射(XRPD)、Rietveld定量分析、光学显微镜和扫描电子显微镜(SEM)分析。大量的岩土工程、矿物学和化学分析指出了两种可能的铅保留机制:在细粒土壤中以碳酸铅沉淀和吸附的形式保留。通过毒性特征浸出程序(TCLP)和顺序提取试验(SET)进一步研究了铅的形态和迁移性。由于TCLP铅浓度不一定反映土壤的总铅分析结果,发现铅浸出率(TCLP/总量)受土壤矿物学及其对系统pH值变化的响应控制。使用Visual MINTEQ进行地球化学建模,以评估控制观察到的TCLP铅淋溶行为的机制。结果发现,碳酸铅沉淀/溶解反应控制了所有土壤中铅的TCLP淋溶性,而即使在细粒土壤中,吸附现象似乎也不起作用。更具体地说,TCLP铅淋溶性受溶液中的pH值、有效铅和有效碳酸盐控制。这表明地球化学建模有力地补充了TCLP铅分析。因此,地球化学建模是评估靶场土壤中特定场地铅相关环境问题严重程度的重要评估工具。在SET过程中发生的涉及金属铅的碳酸化反应掩盖了其可靠确定铅形态的能力。更具体地说,SET将可提取的铅归为预先确定的相类别,这些类别可能并不真正代表实际土壤矿物学或土壤中铅的主要形式。因此,对靶场土壤进行全面的岩土工程、矿物学和化学研究,并辅以地球化学建模,被认为是评估靶场土壤中铅形态和TCLP释放的更可靠方法。