Ozcan M, Vallittu P K, Huysmans M-C, Kalk W, Vahlberg T
Department of Dentistry and Dental Hygiene, University of Groningen, Faculty of Medical Sciences, Antonius Deusinglaan 1, 9713 AV, Groningen, The Netherlands.
J Mater Sci Mater Med. 2006 Jan;17(1):7-13. doi: 10.1007/s10856-006-6324-4.
Bulk fracture of teeth, where a part of the amalgam restoration and/or the cusp is fractured, is a common clinical problem. The aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of different surface conditioning methods on the shear bond strength of a hybrid resin composite to fresh amalgam. Amalgams (N=84) were condensed into acrylic and randomly assigned to one of the following treatments (N=6): (1) Alloy primer + opaquer, (2) Air-particle abrasion (50 micro m Al(2)O(3)) + alloy primer + opaquer, (3) Silica coating (30 micro m SiO(x)) + silanization + opaquer, (4) Opaquer + pre-impregnated continuous bidirectional E-glass fibre sheets, (5) Silica coating + silanization + fibre sheets, (6) Silica coating + silanization + opaquer + fibre sheet application. Non-conditioned amalgam surfaces were considered as control group (7). The mean surface roughness depth (R(Z)) was measured from the control group and air-abraded amalgam surfaces. The resin composite was bonded to the conditioned amalgam specimens using polyethylene molds. All specimens were tested under dry and thermocycled (6.000, 5-55 degrees C, 30 s) conditions. The shear bond strength of resin composite to amalgam substrates was measured in a universal testing machine (1 mm/min). Surface roughness values for the non-conditioned control group (R(Z) approximately 0.14 micro m) and for air-particle abraded surfaces with either Al(2)O(3) or SiO(x) (R(Z) approximately 0.19 micro m and R(Z) approximately 0.16 micro m, respectively) did not show significant differences (p=0.23) (One-way ANOVA). In dry conditions, silica coating and silanization followed by fibre sheet application exhibited significantly higher results (14.8+/-5.6 MPa) than those of the groups conditioned with alloy primer (2.2+/-0.7 MPa) (p<0.001), air-particle abrasion+alloy primer (4.4+/-2.0 MPa, p<0.001), silica coating+silanization alone (6.2+/-0.8 MPa, p=0.009) or non-conditioned group (1.4+/-0.6, p<0.001). Silica coating and silanization followed by additional fibre sheets with opaquer application (23.6+/-6.9 MPa) increased the bond strength significantly compared to those of other groups (group 5 vs group 6, p=0.007; other groups vs group 6, p<0.001). Thermocycling decreased the bond strengths significantly for all of the conditioning methods tested (for group 1, p<0.001; for group 2, p=0.013; for group 3, p=0.002; for group 4, p=0.026; for group 5, p=0.002; for group 6, p<0.001 and for group 7, p<0.001).
牙齿大块折断,即汞合金修复体的一部分和/或牙尖发生折断,是一个常见的临床问题。本研究的目的是评估不同表面处理方法对混合树脂复合材料与新鲜汞合金之间剪切粘结强度的影响。将汞合金(N = 84)压缩成丙烯酸树脂,并随机分配至以下处理之一(N = 6):(1)合金底漆+遮色剂,(2)空气颗粒研磨(50μm Al₂O₃)+合金底漆+遮色剂,(3)二氧化硅涂层(30μm SiOₓ)+硅烷化+遮色剂,(4)遮色剂+预浸渍连续双向E玻璃纤维片,(5)二氧化硅涂层+硅烷化+纤维片,(6)二氧化硅涂层+硅烷化+遮色剂+纤维片应用。未处理的汞合金表面被视为对照组(7)。从对照组和空气研磨的汞合金表面测量平均表面粗糙度深度(R(Z))。使用聚乙烯模具将树脂复合材料粘结到处理过的汞合金标本上。所有标本在干燥和热循环(6000次,5 - 55℃,30秒)条件下进行测试。在万能试验机中以1毫米/分钟的速度测量树脂复合材料与汞合金基底之间的剪切粘结强度。未处理的对照组(R(Z)约0.14μm)以及用Al₂O₃或SiOₓ进行空气颗粒研磨的表面(R(Z)分别约为0.19μm和0.16μm)之间未显示出显著差异(p = 0.23)(单因素方差分析)。在干燥条件下,先进行二氧化硅涂层和硅烷化然后应用纤维片的组显示出的结果(14.8±5.6 MPa)明显高于用合金底漆处理的组(2.2±0.7 MPa)(p < 0.001)、空气颗粒研磨+合金底漆组(4.4±2.0 MPa,p < 0.001)、仅二氧化硅涂层+硅烷化组(6.2±0.8 MPa,p = 0.009)或未处理组(1.4±0.6,p < 0.001)。与其他组相比,先进行二氧化硅涂层和硅烷化然后额外应用带有遮色剂的纤维片(23.6±6.9 MPa)显著提高了粘结强度(第5组与第6组相比,p = 0.007;其他组与第6组相比,p < 0.001)。对于所有测试的处理方法,热循环均显著降低了粘结强度(第1组,p < 0.001;第2组,p = 0.013;第3组,p = 0.002;第4组,p = 0.026;第5组,p = 0.002;第6组,p < 0.001;第7组,p < 0.001)。