Suppr超能文献

骨科医生关于骨质疏松性骨折患者医学评估与治疗的知识和观点。

Knowledge and opinions of orthopaedic surgeons concerning medical evaluation and treatment of patients with osteoporotic fracture.

作者信息

Skedros John G, Holyoak Joshua D, Pitts Todd C

机构信息

Utah Bone and Joint Center, 5323 South Woodrow Street, Suite 202, Salt Lake City, UT 84107, USA.

出版信息

J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2006 Jan;88(1):18-24. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.D.02949.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

With the exponential increase in osteoporotic fractures, orthopaedic surgeons are in a logical position to become more involved in the medical treatment of this disease. However, it has been hypothesized that surgeons may not be inclined to initiate such treatment if they do not view medical interventions as an extension of their surgical opportunities. The objective of this study was to determine the knowledge and opinions of orthopaedic surgeons with regard to their opportunities for initiating medical treatment of patients with an osteoporotic fracture.

METHODS

A survey consisting of twenty-two questions was administered to 171 orthopaedic surgeons in Utah, Idaho, and Wyoming.

RESULTS

Of the 171 surveys that were mailed, 107 usable surveys were returned (a 63% response rate). A majority of the orthopaedic surgeons thought that it was appropriate to expand their orthopaedic practice to include prescribing pharmacological treatments for osteoporosis (68% agreed or strongly agreed with that statement). However, 47% were concerned enough about adverse events related to some conventional pharmacological treatments that they would rather avoid prescribing them. Of the surgeons who were willing to prescribe these treatments, 74% felt most comfortable prescribing bisphosphonates and >77% felt most comfortable prescribing calcium and vitamin-D supplements. Fifty-one percent considered an apparent osteoporotic fracture and several other clinical risk factors for osteoporosis as sufficient evidence for initiating pharmacological treatments, whereas 72% thought that a bone-density scan should be made before initiating treatment. Although 32% thought that all nonoperative treatment should be the responsibility of a primary care provider, 63% thought that the orthopaedic surgeon should initiate a workup to look for secondary causes of the osteoporosis and should begin medical treatment of patients with an osteoporotic fracture before referring them.

CONCLUSIONS

Although a majority of orthopaedic surgeons believe that they should expand their role in the medical treatment of patients with an osteoporotic fracture, many do not institute medical treatment and think that the patient's primary care providers should be responsible for medical care.

摘要

背景

随着骨质疏松性骨折数量呈指数级增长,骨科医生理应更多地参与到这种疾病的医学治疗中。然而,有假设认为,如果外科医生不将医学干预视为其手术机会的延伸,他们可能不太愿意开展此类治疗。本研究的目的是确定骨科医生对于启动骨质疏松性骨折患者医学治疗机会的知识和看法。

方法

对犹他州、爱达荷州和怀俄明州的171名骨科医生进行了一项包含22个问题的调查。

结果

在寄出的171份调查问卷中,共收回107份有效问卷(回复率为63%)。大多数骨科医生认为扩大骨科业务范围以包括开具骨质疏松症药物治疗是合适的(68%同意或强烈同意这一说法)。然而,47%的医生非常担心一些传统药物治疗相关的不良事件,以至于他们宁愿避免开具这些药物。在愿意开具这些治疗药物的医生中,74%认为开具双膦酸盐最得心应手,超过77%认为开具钙和维生素D补充剂最得心应手。51%的医生认为明显的骨质疏松性骨折和其他一些骨质疏松临床风险因素足以作为启动药物治疗的证据,而72%的医生认为在开始治疗前应进行骨密度扫描。尽管32%的医生认为所有非手术治疗都应由初级保健提供者负责,但63%的医生认为骨科医生应启动检查以寻找骨质疏松的继发原因,并应在将骨质疏松性骨折患者转诊之前开始对其进行医学治疗。

结论

尽管大多数骨科医生认为他们应该在骨质疏松性骨折患者的医学治疗中扩大自己的作用,但许多人并未开展医学治疗,而是认为患者的初级保健提供者应负责医疗护理。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验