Marston Douglas
Special Education Program, University of Minnesota, USA.
J Learn Disabil. 2005 Nov-Dec;38(6):539-44. doi: 10.1177/00222194050380061001.
Response to Intervention (RTI) models have attracted great attention as an alternative to traditional methods used for identifying students with learning disabilities. A major feature of this approach is the implementation of academic interventions in general education and measuring the student's response to those interventions. A common question that needs to be addressed is the number of stages or tiers of intervention necessary in the Response to Intervention model. This article reviews three studies of RTI that investigate the RTI tiers. Sharon Vaughn and Rollanda O'Connor report on studies using the Standard Protocol approach to RTI. David Tilly reports on using the Problem Solving Model as an RTI model. This article summarizes the results of these three investigations.
回应干预(RTI)模式作为识别学习障碍学生的传统方法的替代方案,已引起了广泛关注。这种方法的一个主要特点是在普通教育中实施学业干预,并衡量学生对这些干预的反应。一个需要解决的常见问题是回应干预模式中必要的干预阶段或层级数量。本文回顾了三项关于RTI的研究,这些研究调查了RTI层级。莎伦·沃恩和罗兰达·奥康纳报告了使用标准协议方法进行RTI的研究。大卫·蒂利报告了将问题解决模式用作RTI模式的情况。本文总结了这三项调查的结果。