Suppr超能文献

创伤后外科医生床边超声器官评估(BOAST):WTA多中心研究组的一项初步研究

Surgeon-performed bedside organ assessment with sonography after trauma (BOAST): a pilot study from the WTA Multicenter Group.

作者信息

Rozycki Grace S, Knudson M Margaret, Shackford Steven R, Dicker Rochelle

机构信息

Department of Surgery, Emory University School of Medicine, Grady Memorial Hospital, Atlanta, GA 30303, USA.

出版信息

J Trauma. 2005 Dec;59(6):1356-64. doi: 10.1097/01.ta.0000197825.48451.74.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Although nonoperative management of solid organ injuries is a well-accepted practice, a rapid method to assess the progression of the injury, the early development of organ-related complications, and the frequency with which follow-up computed tomography (CT) scans are needed has yet to be determined. The use of ultrasound in this setting may provide information that would improve the rate of organ salvage and decrease the patient's morbidity. The objectives of this study were to determine whether surgeons could successfully use a bedside organ assessment with sonography after trauma (BOAST) examination to: (1) detect a solid organ injury; and (2) assess for changes in the size of the organ injury, an increase or decrease in hemoperitoneum, and the development of organ-related complications.

METHODS

A prospective, multicenter study was conducted using BOAST to evaluate patients undergoing nonoperative management of their solid organ injuries. Patients had to have: (1) a Focused Assessment for Sonography of Trauma (FAST) examination on admission; (2) a solid organ injury documented by an admission abdominal CT scan; and (3) the criteria for nonoperative management. BOAST was performed within 24 hours of admission and every 3 to 4 days to evaluate for an increase or decrease in hemoperitoneum [Ultrasound (US) heme score: from 0 = none to 3 = large], change in injury size, and organ-specific complications. BOAST results were compared with the radiologists' interpretation of the initial and follow-up CT scans, and with patient outcomes.

RESULTS

During a 22 month period, 126 patients sustained 135 solid organ injuries, 46 (34.1%) of these were seen by BOAST (Error rate = 66%). Serial US heme scores = 0 (no hemoperitoneum) were observed in 56 of 126 patients who had a combination of multi-system injury and a dropping Hgb, indicating that there was no further bleeding from the injured organ(s). Surgeons detected 13 of the 15 complications that were confirmed later by conventional imaging.

CONCLUSIONS

(1) BOAST has limitations in identifying solid organ injuries, especially those that are lower grade; (2) the US heme score is a valuable adjunct to the clinical examination in following patients with high-grade solid organ injuries and a dropping hemoglobin; and (3) although uncommon, organ-related complications may be identified using BOAST.

摘要

背景

尽管实体器官损伤的非手术治疗是一种广泛接受的做法,但尚未确定一种快速评估损伤进展、器官相关并发症早期发展以及所需随访计算机断层扫描(CT)频率的方法。在此情况下使用超声可能会提供有助于提高器官挽救率并降低患者发病率的信息。本研究的目的是确定外科医生能否成功使用创伤后床边器官超声评估(BOAST)检查来:(1)检测实体器官损伤;(2)评估器官损伤大小的变化、腹腔积血的增加或减少以及器官相关并发症的发生情况。

方法

进行了一项前瞻性多中心研究,使用BOAST评估接受实体器官损伤非手术治疗的患者。患者必须具备:(1)入院时进行创伤超声重点评估(FAST)检查;(2)入院腹部CT扫描记录有实体器官损伤;(3)符合非手术治疗标准。在入院后24小时内及每3至4天进行BOAST检查,以评估腹腔积血的增加或减少[超声(US)血红素评分:从0 =无到3 =大量]、损伤大小的变化以及器官特异性并发症。将BOAST结果与放射科医生对初始和随访CT扫描的解读以及患者的预后进行比较。

结果

在22个月期间,126例患者发生了135处实体器官损伤,其中46处(34.1%)接受了BOAST检查(错误率 = 66%)。在126例合并多系统损伤和血红蛋白下降的患者中,有56例连续超声血红素评分为0(无腹腔积血)[1],表明受伤器官没有进一步出血。外科医生检测到的15例并发症中有13例后来经传统影像学检查得到证实。

结论

(1)BOAST在识别实体器官损伤方面存在局限性,尤其是低级别损伤;(2)超声血红素评分对于伴有血红蛋白下降的高级别实体器官损伤患者的临床检查是一项有价值的辅助手段;(3)尽管不常见,但使用BOAST可能识别出器官相关并发症。 [1] 此处原文未明确说明“56例连续超声血红素评分为0(无腹腔积血)”与“合并多系统损伤和血红蛋白下降的患者”之间的具体关联,译文保留原文结构。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验