Kennedy Patrick J
United States House of Representatives, USA.
Harvard J Legis. 2004 Summer;41(2):363-75.
In this Policy Essay, Representative Patrick Kennedy argues that insurance discrimination against those suffering from mental illness constitutes a serious and often overlooked deficiency of the modern American health care system. While the Mental Health Parity Act of 1996 was an important step toward resolutions of this issue, many loopholes remain that allow insurance companies to deny much-needed coverage to those suffering from such illnesses. This Essay details how improving access to health insurance for the mentally ill is not only socially beneficial, but also economically sound; the cost of instituting mental health parity is far outweighed by the costs that employers bear because of the reduced productivity of untreated mental illness sufferers. Representative Kennedy recommends that these problems may be addressed by additional mental health policy legislation--specifically, the proposed Paul Wellstone Act.
在这篇政策文章中,众议员帕特里克·肯尼迪认为,保险公司对精神疾病患者的歧视是现代美国医疗体系中一个严重且常被忽视的缺陷。虽然1996年的《精神健康平权法案》是朝着解决这一问题迈出的重要一步,但仍存在许多漏洞,使保险公司得以拒绝为这些患者提供急需的保险。本文详述了改善精神病患者获得医疗保险的机会不仅对社会有益,在经济上也是合理的;实施精神健康平权的成本远远低于雇主因未治疗的精神疾病患者生产力下降而承担的成本。肯尼迪众议员建议,这些问题可通过额外的精神健康政策立法来解决——具体而言,即提议的《保罗·韦尔斯通法案》。