Akintoye Sunday O, Lam Thanh, Shi Songtao, Brahim Jaime, Collins Michael T, Robey Pamela G
Department of Oral Medicine, University of Pennsylvania School of Dental Medicine, The Robert Schattner Center Room 209 240 South 40th Street, Philadelphia, 19104, USA.
Bone. 2006 Jun;38(6):758-68. doi: 10.1016/j.bone.2005.10.027. Epub 2006 Jan 3.
Autologous grafts from axial and appendicular bones commonly used to repair orofacial bone defects often result in unfavorable outcome. This clinical observation, along with the fact that many bone abnormalities are limited to craniofacial bones, suggests that there are significant differences in bone metabolism in orofacial, axial and appendicular bones. It is plausible that these differences are dictated by site-specificity of embryological progenitor cells and osteogenic properties of resident multipotent human bone marrow stromal cells (hBMSCs). This study investigated skeletal site-specific phenotypic and functional differences between orofacial (maxilla and mandible) and axial (iliac crest) hBMSCs in vitro and in vivo. Primary cultures of maxilla, mandible and iliac crest hBMSCs were established with and without osteogenic inducers. Site-specific characterization included colony forming efficiency, cell proliferation, life span before senescence, relative presence of surface markers, adipogenesis, osteogenesis and transplantation in immunocompromised mice to compare bone regenerative capacity. Compared with iliac crest cells, orofacial hBMSCs (OF-MSCs) proliferated more rapidly with delayed senescence, expressed higher levels of alkaline phosphatase and demonstrated more calcium accumulation in vitro. Cells isolated from the three skeletal sites were variably positive for STRO 1, a marker of hBMSCs. OF-MSCs formed more bone in vivo, while iliac crest hBMSCs formed more compacted bone that included hematopoietic tissue and were more responsive in vitro and in vivo to osteogenic and adipogenic inductions. These data demonstrate that hBMSCs from the same individuals differ in vitro and in vivo in a skeletal site-specific fashion and identified orofacial marrow stromal cells as unique cell populations. Further understanding of site-specific properties of hBMSCs and their impact on site-specific bone diseases and regeneration are needed.
常用于修复口腔颌面骨缺损的来自中轴骨和附属骨的自体移植物,往往会导致不理想的结果。这一临床观察结果,以及许多骨骼异常仅限于颅面骨这一事实,表明口腔颌面骨、中轴骨和附属骨的骨代谢存在显著差异。这些差异可能是由胚胎祖细胞的位点特异性和驻留的多能人类骨髓基质细胞(hBMSCs)的成骨特性所决定的。本研究在体外和体内研究了口腔颌面(上颌骨和下颌骨)和中轴(髂嵴)hBMSCs之间骨骼位点特异性的表型和功能差异。在有或没有成骨诱导剂的情况下,建立了上颌骨、下颌骨和髂嵴hBMSCs的原代培养物。位点特异性表征包括集落形成效率、细胞增殖、衰老前的寿命、表面标志物的相对存在、脂肪生成、成骨以及在免疫缺陷小鼠中的移植,以比较骨再生能力。与髂嵴细胞相比,口腔颌面hBMSCs(OF-MSCs)增殖更快,衰老延迟,碱性磷酸酶表达水平更高,并且在体外表现出更多的钙积累。从三个骨骼位点分离的细胞对hBMSCs的标志物STRO 1呈不同程度的阳性。OF-MSCs在体内形成更多的骨,而髂嵴hBMSCs形成更多包含造血组织的致密骨,并且在体外和体内对成骨和脂肪生成诱导的反应更强。这些数据表明,来自同一个体的hBMSCs在体外和体内以骨骼位点特异性方式存在差异,并将口腔颌面骨髓基质细胞鉴定为独特的细胞群体。需要进一步了解hBMSCs的位点特异性特性及其对位点特异性骨疾病和再生的影响。