Suppr超能文献

采用稳定练习治疗产后骨盆带疼痛还是不采用?

To treat or not to treat postpartum pelvic girdle pain with stabilizing exercises?

作者信息

Stuge Britt, Holm Inger, Vøllestad Nina

机构信息

Section for Health Science, University of Oslo, P.O. Box 1153, Blindern, N-0316 Oslo, Norway.

出版信息

Man Ther. 2006 Nov;11(4):337-43. doi: 10.1016/j.math.2005.07.004. Epub 2006 Jan 9.

Abstract

Women with pelvic girdle pain (PGP) often consult physical therapists for help and are treated with different therapies without firm evidence for the effectiveness. Two randomized controlled trials have investigated the effect of stabilizing exercises for PGP. The most recent study demonstrated significant positive results in favour of exercises (Stuge et al. The efficacy of a treatment program focusing on specific stabilizing exercises for pelvic girdle pain after pregnancy. A randomized controlled trial. Spine 2004a;29(10):351-9), the other did not (Mens et al. Diagonal trunk muscle exercises in peripartum pelvic pain: a randomized clinical trial. Phys. Ther. 2000;80(12):1164-73). Consequently, the two studies provide contradictory advice for treatment of PGP. The question is thus, whether stabilizing exercises should be recommended as treatment for PGP. Both the studies are of high methodological quality and are comparable with regard to subjects studied. However, there are several differences in the interventions and these are explored and discussed for better understanding of the conflicting results. Exercises that focused on only global muscles showed no effect. However, these exercises were not individualized and they were instructed by videotape. In the more recent study, exercises that initially focused on local muscles, and then gradually added global muscles showed a significant, positive effect. Exercises in that study were supervised, corrected, individualized concerning choice of exercises, order and dosage, and pain was avoided. This comparison indicates that effective treatment of postpartum PGP may be achieved when exercises for the entire spinal musculature are included, individually guided and adapted to each individual.

摘要

患有骨盆带疼痛(PGP)的女性经常向物理治疗师寻求帮助,并接受各种不同的治疗方法,但这些治疗方法的有效性缺乏确凿证据。两项随机对照试验研究了稳定化训练对PGP的效果。最近的一项研究显示了有利于训练的显著积极结果(Stuge等人。一项针对产后骨盆带疼痛的特定稳定化训练治疗方案的疗效。一项随机对照试验。《脊柱》2004年a卷;29(10):351 - 359),另一项则没有(Mens等人。围产期骨盆疼痛的斜向躯干肌肉训练:一项随机临床试验。《物理治疗》2000年;80(12):1164 - 1173)。因此,这两项研究为PGP的治疗提供了相互矛盾的建议。问题在于,是否应推荐稳定化训练作为PGP的治疗方法。这两项研究都具有很高的方法学质量,并且在所研究的对象方面具有可比性。然而,干预措施存在几个差异,为了更好地理解相互矛盾的结果,对这些差异进行了探讨和讨论。仅关注整体肌肉的训练没有效果。然而,这些训练没有个体化,并且是通过录像带指导的。在最近的研究中,最初关注局部肌肉,然后逐渐增加整体肌肉的训练显示出显著的积极效果。该研究中的训练是有监督的、经过纠正的,在训练选择、顺序和剂量方面是个体化的,并且避免了疼痛。这种比较表明,当纳入针对整个脊柱肌肉组织的训练、进行个别指导并根据个体情况进行调整时,可能实现产后PGP的有效治疗。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验