Mochtar C A, Kiemeney L A L M, van Riemsdijk M M, Laguna M P, Debruyne F M J, de la Rosette J J M C H
Department of Urology, Academic Medical Centre, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
J Urol. 2006 Jan;175(1):213-6. doi: 10.1016/S0022-5347(05)00038-8.
We assessed the value of baseline PVR as predictor of the need for invasive therapy during long-term followup of patients with clinical BPH treated initially with alpha1-blockers or WW.
The records of a cohort of 942 patients with BPH treated with alpha(1)-blockers or WW were reviewed. Baseline I-PSS scores, PSA, prostate volume, uroflowmetry, pressure flow parameters and followup data were collected prospectively. Correlations between PVR and other baseline parameters were calculated. The 5-year cumulative risks of invasive therapy were calculated with the Kaplan-Meier method. After stratification of PVR by various cutoff levels (50, 100 and 300 ml), rate ratios between large and small PVRs were calculated using proportional hazards analyses.
PVR has weak (-0.2<R <0.2) correlations with other baseline parameters. With increasing PVR cutoff levels, the 5-year cumulative risk of invasive therapy for the large PVR subgroup, increases from 45% to 64% and from 15% to 21% in the alpha1-blockers and WW group, respectively. Large PVR yields a significant 2-fold up to a 4-fold increased risk of invasive therapy compared to small PVR in both treatment groups. In multivariate models these significant risk differences largely disappear, although a statistically not significant higher risk remains for the large PVR (greater than 300 ml) patients.
In general, baseline PVR has little prognostic value for the risk of BPH related invasive therapy in patients on alpha1-blocker and WW. Only patients with large PVR have a 2-fold increased risk of invasive therapy compared to patients with smaller PVR.
我们评估了基线残余尿量(PVR)在最初接受α1受体阻滞剂或等待观察(WW)治疗的临床良性前列腺增生(BPH)患者长期随访期间作为侵入性治疗需求预测指标的价值。
回顾了一组942例接受α1受体阻滞剂或等待观察治疗的BPH患者的记录。前瞻性收集基线国际前列腺症状评分(I-PSS)、前列腺特异性抗原(PSA)、前列腺体积、尿流率、压力流参数及随访数据。计算PVR与其他基线参数之间的相关性。采用Kaplan-Meier法计算侵入性治疗的5年累积风险。在将PVR按不同截断水平(50、100和300 ml)分层后,使用比例风险分析计算大PVR与小PVR之间的率比。
PVR与其他基线参数的相关性较弱(-0.2 < R < 0.2)。随着PVR截断水平的升高,α1受体阻滞剂组和等待观察组中大PVR亚组的侵入性治疗5年累积风险分别从45%增至64%和从15%增至21%。在两个治疗组中,与小PVR相比,大PVR导致侵入性治疗风险显著增加2至4倍。在多变量模型中,这些显著的风险差异大多消失,尽管大PVR(大于300 ml)患者仍存在统计学上不显著的较高风险。
总体而言,基线PVR对接受α1受体阻滞剂和等待观察治疗的BPH患者发生BPH相关侵入性治疗风险的预后价值不大。只有大PVR患者与小PVR患者相比,侵入性治疗风险增加2倍。