• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

抽象与具体之间的相互作用:研究伦理标准与作为象征性的研究实践

The interplay between the abstract and the particular: research ethics standards and the practice of research as symbolic.

作者信息

Peter Elizabeth

机构信息

University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.

出版信息

Nurs Sci Q. 2006 Jan;19(1):20-4; discussion 19. doi: 10.1177/0894318405284122.

DOI:10.1177/0894318405284122
PMID:16407595
Abstract

Ethical standards for research with human participants are increasingly important. With respect to nursing research these standards are symbolic of the interplay between the abstract theoretical aspects of bioethical standards and the particulars of nursing practice. In this column, this interplay is symbolized as a reflective equilibrium. These standards are argued to symbolize not only the dialectic relationship between the abstract and the particular in ethics, but also the general lack of a nursing specific articulation of ethical standards. Further understanding of the distinctiveness of nurses' moral judgments and knowledge is presented as necessary in strengthening the reflective equilibrium.

摘要

涉及人类受试者的研究伦理标准日益重要。对于护理研究而言,这些标准象征着生物伦理标准的抽象理论层面与护理实践细节之间的相互作用。在本专栏中,这种相互作用被象征为一种反思平衡。这些标准不仅被认为象征着伦理中抽象与具体之间的辩证关系,也象征着护理领域对伦理标准缺乏具体明确阐述的普遍情况。进一步理解护士道德判断和知识的独特性对于加强反思平衡而言是必要的。

相似文献

1
The interplay between the abstract and the particular: research ethics standards and the practice of research as symbolic.抽象与具体之间的相互作用:研究伦理标准与作为象征性的研究实践
Nurs Sci Q. 2006 Jan;19(1):20-4; discussion 19. doi: 10.1177/0894318405284122.
2
[Deontological guidelines applicable to nursing research].适用于护理研究的道义论准则
Rech Soins Infirm. 1996 Dec(47):67-72.
3
Symbols and ethics: integrity and the discipline of nursing.符号与伦理:诚信与护理学科
Nurs Sci Q. 2005 Jul;18(3):211-4. doi: 10.1177/0894318405277517.
4
[The origin of informed consent].[知情同意的起源]
Acta Otorhinolaryngol Ital. 2005 Oct;25(5):312-27.
5
Beyond informed consent.超越知情同意。
Bull World Health Organ. 2004 Oct;82(10):771-7.
6
Does research ethics rest on a mistake?研究伦理是否基于一个错误?
Am J Bioeth. 2005 Winter;5(1):34-6; author reply W15-8. doi: 10.1080/15265160590927705.
7
Nursing and euthanasia: a review of argument-based ethics literature.护理与安乐死:基于论证的伦理文献综述
Nurs Ethics. 2009 Jul;16(4):466-86. doi: 10.1177/0969733009104610.
8
How not to rethink research ethics.如何不重新思考研究伦理。
Am J Bioeth. 2005 Winter;5(1):31-3; author reply W15-8. doi: 10.1080/15265160590927697.
9
Essentials of research ethics for healthcare professionals.医疗保健专业人员的研究伦理要点。
Nurs Health Sci. 2005 Jun;7(2):119-25. doi: 10.1111/j.1442-2018.2005.00216.x.
10
Language and the experience of patients' values in nursing care: a theoretical exploration.
Nurse Educ Today. 2007 Feb;27(2):139-44. doi: 10.1016/j.nedt.2006.04.005. Epub 2006 Jun 8.