Suppr超能文献

蕈样肉芽肿和塞扎里综合征治疗的疗效:全国性调查反馈

Efficacy of treatments for mycosis fungoides and Sézary syndrome: nationwide survey responses.

作者信息

Gettler Samuel L, Fung Maxwell A

机构信息

Department of Dermatology, New York Medical College, Valhalla, NY, USA.

出版信息

Dermatol Online J. 2005 Dec 1;11(3):6.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Numerous treatments have been used to treat the mycosis fungoides (MF) and Sezary syndrome (SS) variants of cutaneous T-cell lymphoma (CTCL). The relative efficacy of different treatments is largely unknown.

OBJECTIVE

To determine the frequency of therapies ranked most effective and least effective for treatment of MF and SS in a sampling of dermatologists in the United States.

METHODS

Fellow members in the American Academy of Dermatology in the United States between the ages of 35 and 65 years were surveyed regarding demographic variables and treatment efficacy for patch/plaque MF (stages Ia-Ib CTCL), tumor stage MF (stage IIb), and erythrodermic MF/SS (stage III).

RESULTS

Based on 1,399 responses, PUVA was preferred for the management of patch/plaque MF. Total skin electron beam (TSEB) therapy was preferred for tumor stage MF. Photopheresis (extracorporeal photochemotherapy) was preferred for erythrodermic MF/SS, followed closely by TSEB. Especially for tumor stage and erythrodermic MF/SS, physicians without a clear preference comprised the largest group. No significant variation depending on practice type, degree of practitioner experience, or geographic location was identified.

CONCLUSION

PUVA was the preferred treatment for Stage Ia and Ib MF. The predominance of surveys with indeterminate responses suggests limited experience and in the treatment of CTCL, especially in advanced stages.

摘要

背景

已采用多种治疗方法来治疗皮肤T细胞淋巴瘤(CTCL)的蕈样肉芽肿(MF)和塞扎里综合征(SS)变体。不同治疗方法的相对疗效很大程度上尚不清楚。

目的

在美国皮肤科医生抽样调查中确定治疗MF和SS最有效和最无效的疗法的频率。

方法

对年龄在35至65岁之间的美国皮肤科学会会员就斑片/斑块状MF(CTCL的Ia-Ib期)、肿瘤期MF(IIb期)和红皮病型MF/SS(III期)的人口统计学变量和治疗疗效进行调查。

结果

基于1399份回复,补骨脂素紫外线A光化学疗法(PUVA)是治疗斑片/斑块状MF的首选。全身皮肤电子束(TSEB)疗法是肿瘤期MF的首选。光分离置换法(体外光化学疗法)是红皮病型MF/SS的首选,紧随其后的是TSEB。特别是对于肿瘤期和红皮病型MF/SS,没有明确偏好的医生占最大比例。未发现因执业类型、从业者经验程度或地理位置而产生的显著差异。

结论

PUVA是Ia期和Ib期MF的首选治疗方法。不确定反应的调查占主导地位表明在CTCL治疗方面经验有限,尤其是在晚期。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验