Suppr超能文献

胃残端癌的全胃切除术比通常的胃癌全胃切除术侵袭性更强。

[Total gastrectomy of gastric stump carcinomas is more invasive than usual total gastrectomy for gastric carcinomas].

作者信息

Takahashi Hitoshi

机构信息

Department of Anesthesiology, Miura City Hospital, Miura 238-0222.

出版信息

Masui. 2006 Jan;55(1):79-81.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

It is said that total gastrectomy of gastric stump carcinomas is more invasive than usual total gastrectomy for gastric carcinoma.

METHODS

We compared the duration of the surgeries, blood loss, transfusion, and postoperative complications between patients having undergone total gastrectomy of gastric stump carcinomas (Group A, N=9) and those having undergone usual total gastrectomy for gastric carcinomas without remarkable preoperative complication (Group B, N=9).

RESULTS

The surgical duration of Group A was significantly longer than that of Group B. The amount of blood loss was larger in Group A than in Group B. Postoperative severe complications occurred more often in Group A than in Group B.

CONCLUSIONS

This study showes that total gastrectomy of gastric stump carcinomas is more invasive than usual total gastrectomy without preoperative complications. This seems to have been caused by adhesion of organs around the rest stomachs and carcinomas were very likely to be advanced ones in Group A. We should take the findings into considerations for maximum surgical blood order schedule (MSBOS) and prevention of severe postoperative complications in group A apart from group B.

摘要

背景

据说胃残端癌的全胃切除术比通常的胃癌全胃切除术更具侵袭性。

方法

我们比较了接受胃残端癌全胃切除术的患者(A组,n = 9)和接受无明显术前并发症的通常胃癌全胃切除术的患者(B组,n = 9)之间的手术时间、失血量、输血量和术后并发症。

结果

A组的手术时间明显长于B组。A组的失血量比B组多。A组术后严重并发症的发生率高于B组。

结论

本研究表明,胃残端癌的全胃切除术比无术前并发症的通常全胃切除术更具侵袭性。这似乎是由残胃周围器官的粘连引起的,并且A组的癌症很可能是进展期癌症。除B组外,我们应在A组中考虑这些发现,以制定最大手术用血计划(MSBOS)并预防严重的术后并发症。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验