Burger Ingrid, Sugarman Jeremy, Goodman Steven N
Department of Health Policy and Management, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, MD 21205, USA.
Surg Clin North Am. 2006 Feb;86(1):151-68, x. doi: 10.1016/j.suc.2005.10.003.
Evidence-based medicine, although ostensibly concerned with the research evidence underlying claims of efficacy for surgical procedures,has a direct connection with the ethics of surgical decision making. Questions of whether new procedures should ever be performed on patients outside of a formal research protocol, what the patient should be told about the uncertainties inherent in the use of nonvalidated innovative procedures, when formal evaluation is necessary, what form that evaluation should take, and how the burdens and results of such research can be distributed fairly all involve balancing competing ethical principles. Good ethics requires good facts, and evidence from well-controlled experiments provides best information upon which to base decisions in these areas and to build ethical surgical practice.
循证医学虽然表面上关注手术疗效宣称背后的研究证据,但与手术决策伦理有着直接联系。关于是否应在正式研究方案之外对患者实施新手术、应告知患者使用未经证实的创新手术所固有的不确定性、何时需要进行正式评估、评估应采取何种形式以及如何公平分配此类研究的负担和结果等问题,都涉及到平衡相互竞争的伦理原则。良好的伦理需要良好的事实依据,来自严格对照实验的证据能提供最佳信息,以此为这些领域的决策提供依据,并构建符合伦理的外科实践。