Hamming N, Lovely D F
Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, University of New Brunswick, PO Box 4400, Fredericton, Canada E3B 5A3.
Med Eng Phys. 2007 Jan;29(1):148-53. doi: 10.1016/j.medengphy.2005.12.004. Epub 2006 Jan 27.
Surface recorded somatosensory evoked potentials (SEPs) are neural signals elicited by an external stimulus. In the case of electrically induced SEPs, the artifact generated by the stimulation process can severely distort the signal. The artifact is characterized by a large impulse followed by a slowly decaying tail. In some cases, the artifact tail often lasts well into the initiation of the SEP making the determination of absolute latency very difficult. While the literature often states that the recording instrumentation plays a part in the generation of this artifact tail, no firm evidence has ever been presented. In this work, comparisons are made between three instrumentation systems (BJT, JFET and CMOS) with differing input impedances in an attempt to quantify the effects on the artifact tail. The conclusions from this investigation show that there is no significant interaction between the input impedance of the recording instrumentation and the duration of the artifact tail. Each amplifier type produced results with no significant statistical differences. It was also found that while stimulation amplitude has a weak effect on the artifact tail, the greatest contribution to variation has an inter-subject origin. Consequently, it is concluded that the time constant of the artifact tail must originate from other sources that are subject dependent.
表面记录的体感诱发电位(SEPs)是由外部刺激引发的神经信号。在电诱发SEPs的情况下,刺激过程产生的伪迹会严重扭曲信号。该伪迹的特征是一个大的脉冲后跟一个缓慢衰减的尾部。在某些情况下,伪迹尾部常常会持续到SEP开始阶段,这使得确定绝对潜伏期非常困难。虽然文献中经常指出记录仪器在这种伪迹尾部的产生中起一定作用,但从未有确凿证据。在这项工作中,对三种具有不同输入阻抗的仪器系统(BJT、JFET和CMOS)进行了比较,试图量化对伪迹尾部的影响。这项研究的结论表明,记录仪器的输入阻抗与伪迹尾部的持续时间之间没有显著相互作用。每种放大器类型产生的结果在统计上没有显著差异。还发现,虽然刺激幅度对伪迹尾部有微弱影响,但变异的最大贡献来自个体间差异。因此,得出结论,伪迹尾部的时间常数必定源自其他个体相关的来源。