Suppr超能文献

Vapor pressure determinations of 8-2 fluorortelomer alcohol and 1-H perfluorooctane by capillary gas chromatography Relative retention time versus headspace methods.

作者信息

Cobranchi Daryl P, Botelho Miguel, Buxton L William, Buck Robert C, Kaiser Mary A

机构信息

DuPont Corporate Center for Analytical Sciences, PO Box 80402, Wilmington, DE 19880-0402, USA.

出版信息

J Chromatogr A. 2006 Mar 10;1108(2):248-51. doi: 10.1016/j.chroma.2006.01.020. Epub 2006 Jan 26.

Abstract

Two distinctly different capillary gas chromatographic methods were used to determine the vapor pressure of 8-2 fluorotelomer alcohol (8-2 FTOH) and 1-H perfluoroheptane at several temperatures. For measurements employing the relative retention-time method, a short polymethylsiloxane column was used from 25 to 65 degrees C. For the 8-2 FTOH, hydrocarbon alcohols and perfluoroalcohols were used as reference standards. For 1-H perfluoroheptane, hydrocarbons were used as reference standards. Vapor pressure estimates could differ by as much as an order of magnitude compared to published results determined by other (nonchromatographic) methods. This variance may be a function of solvent-solute interactions within the gas chromatographic column and the infinite dilution assumption, both used in the relative retention method. For comparison, data were also gathered using headspace gas chromatography (GC) with atomic emission detection (AED). The results from this novel GC/AED method were consistent with prior nonchromatographic results. A discussion of why headspace is the preferred technique for the determination of vapor pressure for fluorinated compounds is presented.

摘要

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验