Zimmer Bernd
Private Orthodontic Practice, Kassel, Germany.
J Orofac Orthop. 2006 Jan;67(1):37-47. doi: 10.1007/s00056-006-0528-6.
OBJECTIVE: After localized space closure in the mandible it is desirable to preserve lower wisdom teeth as natural replacements for missing second premolars and as antagonists for upper second molars. The aim of this study was to determine whether this treatment method can obviate the need for prosthodontic restorations, implants, and third molar osteotomy. Furthermore the time point of possible third molar eruption was to be determined and whether further orthodontic interventions were required to achieve their alignment. PATIENTS AND METHODS: The test group comprised 34 patients who exhibited agenesis of one or both lower second premolars (n = 45) in conjunction with a corresponding number of third molar tooth germs. Follow-up examinations were performed 2 to 8 years after conclusion of orthodontic treatment involving push-and-pull mechanics (PPM) without extraction of any contralateral teeth. The results of the clinical retrospective follow-up examination at consecutive post-treatment endpoints were compared with two orthodontic control groups (A: 4-premolar extraction group, B: non-extraction group). RESULTS: After an average of 4 years and 2 months, the percentage of fully-erupted third molars in the agenesis group with localized space closure was 82%, compared to 29% and 28%, respectively, in the controls. These differences were statistically significant (p < or = 0.01). The success rate in the agenesis group reached 94% when the 4- to 8-year results were considered in isolation. Compared with the contralateral (non-aplastic) side, teeth on the aplastic side erupted prematurely. In 9% of the cases, minor orthodontic interventions were required to exactly position the third molars. CONCLUSION: There is high probability that mandibular third molars can be preserved after localized space closure, obviating the need for prosthodontic restorations, dental implants, and third molar osteotomies.
目的:在下颌局部间隙关闭后,保留下颌智齿作为缺失第二前磨牙的天然替代物以及上颌第二磨牙的拮抗牙是理想的。本研究的目的是确定这种治疗方法是否可以避免义齿修复、种植和第三磨牙截骨术的需求。此外,要确定第三磨牙可能萌出的时间点,以及是否需要进一步的正畸干预来使其排列整齐。 患者与方法:试验组由34例患者组成,这些患者表现出一侧或双侧下颌第二前磨牙先天缺失(n = 45),并伴有相应数量的第三磨牙牙胚。在采用推挽力学(PPM)且未拔除任何对侧牙齿的正畸治疗结束后2至8年进行随访检查。将连续治疗后终点的临床回顾性随访检查结果与两个正畸对照组(A:拔除四颗前磨牙组,B:不拔牙组)进行比较。 结果:平均4年零2个月后,局部间隙关闭的先天缺失组中第三磨牙完全萌出的百分比为82%,而对照组分别为29%和28%。这些差异具有统计学意义(p≤0.01)。单独考虑4至8年的结果时,先天缺失组的成功率达到94%。与对侧(非发育不全)侧相比,发育不全侧的牙齿过早萌出。在9%的病例中,需要进行轻微的正畸干预来精确定位第三磨牙。 结论:下颌局部间隙关闭后,下颌第三磨牙很有可能得以保留,从而避免义齿修复、牙种植和第三磨牙截骨术的需求。
Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2000-8
Nihon Kyosei Shika Gakkai Zasshi. 1990-8
J Dent Child (Chic). 2003
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2006-7
East Mediterr Health J. 2008
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2001-3