Suppr超能文献

外周血、骨髓及纯化白细胞亚群中嵌合体的定量分析:短串联重复序列(STR)位点单重和多重PCR扩增的比较

Quantification of chimerism within peripheral blood, bone marrow and purified leukocyte subsets: comparison of singleplex and multiplex PCR amplification of short tandem repeat (STR) loci.

作者信息

Beck O, Seidl C, Lehrnbecher T, Kreyenberg H, Schwabe D, Klingebiel T, Seifried E, Bader P, Koehl U

机构信息

Paediatric Haematology and Oncology, J.W. Goethe University Frankfurt/Main, Germany.

出版信息

Eur J Haematol. 2006 Mar;76(3):237-44. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0609.2005.00588.x.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE AND METHODS

Chimerism analysis has become a routine diagnostic procedure after haematopoietic allogeneic stem cell transplantation for early detection of relapse of disease or graft failure. Whereas some centres developed individual in-house short tandem repeat (STR) systems, others prefer commercial multiplex PCR systems. However, little is known about inter-assay variation, which could have a significant impact on treatment decision. We therefore compared two commercial multiplex PCR kits with our in-house STR system using different sample sources, such as peripheral blood (PB), bone marrow (BM) and specific leukocyte subsets.

RESULTS

Fifty samples of eighteen paediatric patients were analysed. For neither material, PB, BM and leukocyte subtypes, a significant difference between the STR systems tested was observed. Chimerism analyses of each single STR primer, which is component of both the in-house and the commercial STR system, did not reveal significant differences.

CONCLUSION

Our analysis demonstrates that similar results can be obtained with both assays, even when using various sample sources. Further evaluation of different test systems will help to increase interlaboratory standardisation of chimerism analyses for early clinical intervention.

摘要

目的与方法

嵌合体分析已成为异基因造血干细胞移植后的常规诊断程序,用于疾病复发或移植物失败的早期检测。一些中心开发了各自的内部短串联重复序列(STR)系统,而其他中心则倾向于使用商业多重聚合酶链反应(PCR)系统。然而,关于不同检测方法间的差异知之甚少,而这可能会对治疗决策产生重大影响。因此,我们使用不同的样本来源,如外周血(PB)、骨髓(BM)和特定白细胞亚群,将两种商业多重PCR试剂盒与我们的内部STR系统进行了比较。

结果

分析了18例儿科患者的50份样本。对于PB、BM和白细胞亚型这两种材料,在所测试的STR系统之间均未观察到显著差异。对内部和商业STR系统共有的每个STR引物进行的嵌合体分析未发现显著差异。

结论

我们的分析表明,即使使用不同的样本来源,两种检测方法也能获得相似的结果。对不同检测系统的进一步评估将有助于提高嵌合体分析的实验室间标准化,以便进行早期临床干预。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验