Schreiber Christian, Kostolny Martin, Hörer Jürgen, Cleuziou Julie, Holper Klaus, Tassani-Prell P, Eicken Andreas, Lange Rüdiger
Clinic of Cardiovascular Surgery, Department of Anesthesiology, German Heart Centre Munich at the Technical University, Munich, Germany.
Cardiol Young. 2006 Feb;16(1):54-60. doi: 10.1017/S104795110500209X.
Fenestration is still widely used in right heart bypass operations. Our study was conducted to assess its need in the most recent modification, the completion of a total cavopulmonary connection with an extracardiac tube. The extracardiac approach was introduced at our institution in January, 1999. Since June of 2000, no patient had a fenestration. If more than 1 risk factor amongst ventricular function being more than moderately impaired, atrioventricular valvar regurgitation more than moderate, mean pulmonary arterial pressure more than 15 millimetres of mercury, mean atrial pressure higher than 12 millimetres of mercury, pulmonary arterial distortion, or other than sinus rhythm was present preoperatively, the patient was considered a "high risk" candidate. Postoperatively elevated pulmonary arterial pressure higher than 16 millimetres of mercury, prolonged effusions and requirement for drainage longer than 7 days, and death were considered endpoints in the statistical analysis. Our study group included 84 patients who underwent surgery up to August, 2004. A previous bidirectional cavopulmonary anastomosis had been accomplished in 73 patients at a mean age of 27.01 plus or minus 32.60 months, with a median of 11.5 months, without creating an additional source of flow of blood to the lungs. At the time of the total cavopulmonary connection, the mean age was 66.4 plus or minus 60.1 months, with a median of 37.1 months, and a range from 17.3 to 251.2 months, with 50 patients being younger than 48 months. We deemed 16 patients to be at "high risk". These patients were older at the time of bidirectional cavopulmonary anstomosis (p smaller than 0.016), at the time of completion (p smaller than 0.019), and also differed in size at time of completion (p smaller than 0.020). They required a longer time on cardiopulmonary bypass (p smaller than 0.015), and reached higher early postoperative pulmonary arterial pressures after completion (p smaller than 0.025). There were no differences between groups of patients having up to 1 or more risk factors in regard to need for intubation (p smaller than 0.511), pulmonary arterial pressures after extubation (p smaller than 0.817), and duration of chest drainage (p smaller than 0.650). Three patients died, one in the group deemed at high risk. There was no death in the last 38 patients. We conclude that a total cavopulmonary connection with an extracardiac tube can be performed without fenestration, even if the patients are deemed to be at increased risk. Early staging of patients with functionally univentricular physiology might be one of the keys for these findings.
开窗术仍广泛应用于右心旁路手术。我们开展这项研究旨在评估在最新术式(即采用心外管道完成全腔静脉肺动脉连接术)中开窗术的必要性。心外途径于1999年1月在我们机构引入。自2000年6月起,没有患者进行开窗术。如果术前存在以下超过1项危险因素:心室功能中度以上受损、房室瓣反流中度以上、平均肺动脉压超过15毫米汞柱、平均心房压高于12毫米汞柱、肺动脉扭曲或非窦性心律,则该患者被视为“高危”候选者。术后肺动脉压高于16毫米汞柱、胸腔积液持续时间延长且引流需求超过7天以及死亡被视为统计分析中的终点指标。我们的研究组包括截至2004年8月接受手术的84例患者。73例患者先前已完成双向腔静脉肺动脉吻合术,平均年龄为27.01±32.60个月,中位数为11.5个月,未额外建立肺部血流来源。在进行全腔静脉肺动脉连接术时,平均年龄为66.4±60.1个月,中位数为37.1个月,范围为17.3至251.2个月,其中50例患者年龄小于48个月。我们认为16例患者属于“高危”。这些患者在进行双向腔静脉肺动脉吻合术时年龄较大(p<0.016),在完成手术时年龄较大(p<0.019),并且在完成手术时体型也有所不同(p<0.020)。他们需要更长的体外循环时间(p<0.015),并且在完成手术后早期肺动脉压更高(p<0.025)。在插管需求(p<0.511)、拔管后肺动脉压(p<0.817)以及胸腔引流持续时间(p<0.650)方面,有1项或更多危险因素的患者组之间没有差异。3例患者死亡,其中1例在被视为高危的组中。最近38例患者中无死亡病例。我们得出结论,即使患者被认为风险增加,采用心外管道的全腔静脉肺动脉连接术也可以不进行开窗术。对功能单心室生理患者进行早期分期可能是这些结果的关键因素之一。