Miller Jim J, Olson Edith C S, Chanasyk David S, Beasley Bruce W, Yanke L Jay, Larney Francis J, McAllister Tim A, Olson Barry M, Selinger L Brent
Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada, P.O. Box 3000, Lethbridge, AB, T1J 4B1 Canada.
J Environ Qual. 2006 Feb 2;35(2):505-15. doi: 10.2134/jeq2005.0205. Print 2006 Mar-Apr.
Soluble salts, nutrients, and pathogenic bacteria in feedlot-pen runoff have the potential to cause pollution of the environment. A 2-yr study (1998-1999) was conducted at a beef cattle (Bos taurus) feedlot in southern Alberta, Canada, to determine the effect of bedding material [barley (Hordeum vulgare L.) straw versus wood chips] and within-pen location on the chemical and bacterial properties of pen-floor runoff. Runoff was generated with a portable rainfall simulator and analyzed for chemical content (nitrogen [N], phosphorus [P], soluble salts, electrical conductivity [EC], sodium adsorption ratio [SAR], dissolved oxygen [DO], and pH) and populations of three groups of bacteria (Escherichia coli, total coliforms, total aerobic heterotrophs at 27 degrees C) in 1998 and 1999. Bedding had a significant (P < or = 0.05) effect on NH4-N concentration and load in 1999, SO4 load in 1998, SO4 concentration and load in 1999, and total coliforms in both years; where these three variables were higher in wood than straw pens. Location had a significant effect on EC and concentrations of total Kjeldahl nitrogen (TKN), Na, K, SO4, and Cl in 1998, and total coliforms in both years. These seven variables were higher at the bedding pack than pen floor location, indicating that bedding packs were major reservoirs of TKN, soluble salts, and total coliforms. Significantly higher dissolved reactive phosphorus (DRP), total P, and NH4-N concentrations and loads at the bedding pack location in wood pens in 1998, and a similar trend for TKN concentration in 1999, indicated that this bedding-location treatment was a greater source of nutrients to runoff than the other three bedding-location treatments. Bedding, location, and their interaction may therefore be a potential tool to manage nutrients, soluble salts, and bacteria in feedlot runoff.
饲养场围栏径流中的可溶性盐、养分和致病细菌有可能造成环境污染。1998年至1999年,在加拿大艾伯塔省南部的一个肉牛(Bos taurus)饲养场进行了一项为期两年的研究,以确定垫料(大麦秸秆与木屑)和围栏内位置对围栏地面径流的化学和细菌特性的影响。使用便携式降雨模拟器产生径流,并在1998年和1999年分析其化学含量(氮、磷、可溶性盐、电导率、钠吸附比、溶解氧和pH值)以及三组细菌(大肠杆菌、总大肠菌群、27摄氏度下的总需氧异养菌)的数量。垫料对1999年的铵态氮浓度和负荷、1998年的硫酸根负荷、1999年的硫酸根浓度和负荷以及两年的总大肠菌群均有显著(P≤0.05)影响;在这三个变量中,木屑围栏中的含量高于秸秆围栏。位置对1998年的电导率以及凯氏定氮法测定的总氮、钠、钾、硫酸根和氯的浓度有显著影响,对两年的总大肠菌群也有显著影响。这七个变量在垫料堆处高于围栏地面位置,表明垫料堆是凯氏定氮法测定的总氮、可溶性盐和总大肠菌群的主要储存库。1998年,木屑围栏垫料堆位置的溶解活性磷、总磷和铵态氮浓度及负荷显著更高,1999年凯氏定氮法测定的总氮浓度也有类似趋势,表明这种垫料 - 位置处理比其他三种垫料 - 位置处理对径流养分的贡献更大。因此,垫料、位置及其相互作用可能是管理饲养场径流中养分、可溶性盐和细菌的潜在工具。