Patrick Kevin, Calfas Karen J, Norman Gregory J, Zabinski Marion F, Sallis James F, Rupp Joan, Covin Jennifer, Cella John
Department of Family and Preventive Medicine, University of California-San Diego, 9500 Gilman Drive, MC 0811 La Jolla, CA 92093, USA.
Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med. 2006 Feb;160(2):128-36. doi: 10.1001/archpedi.160.2.128.
Many adolescents do not meet national guidelines for participation in regular moderate or vigorous physical activity (PA); limitations on sedentary behaviors; or dietary intake of fruits and vegetables, fiber, or total dietary fat. This study evaluated a health care-based intervention to improve these behaviors.
Randomized controlled trial.
Primary care with follow-up at home.
Eight hundred seventy-eight adolescent girls and boys aged 11 to 15 years.
Two experimental conditions: (1) Primary care, office-based, computer-assisted diet and PA assessment and stage-based goal setting followed by brief health care provider counseling and 12 months of monthly mail and telephone counseling and (2) a comparison condition addressing sun exposure protection.
Minutes per week of moderate plus vigorous PA measured by self-report and accelerometer; self-report of days per week of PA and sedentary behaviors; and percentage of energy from fat and servings per day of fruits and vegetables measured by three 24-hour diet recalls. Body mass index (calculated as weight in kilograms divided by the square of height in meters) was a secondary outcome.
Compared with adolescents in the sun protection condition, girls and boys in the diet and PA intervention significantly reduced sedentary behaviors (intervention vs control change, 4.3 to 3.4 h/d vs 4.2 to 4.4 h/d for girls, respectively [P = .001]; 4.2 to 3.2 h/d vs 4.2 to 4.3 h/d for boys, respectively [P = .001]). Boys reported more active days per week (intervention vs control change: 4.1 to 4.4 d/wk vs 3.8 to 3.8 d/w, respectively [P = .01]), and the number of servings of fruits and vegetables for girls approached significance (intervention vs control change, 3.5 to 4.2 servings/d vs 3.5 to 3.9 servings/d, respectively [P = .07]). No intervention effects were seen with percentage of calories from fat or minutes of PA per week. Percentage of adolescents meeting recommended health guidelines was significantly improved for girls for consumption of saturated fat (intervention vs control change, 23.4% to 41.0% vs 18.5% to 31%, respectively [relative risk, 1.33; 95% confidence interval, 1.01-1.68]) and for boys' participation in d/wk of PA (intervention vs control change, 45.3% to 55.4% vs 41.9% to 38.0%, respectively [relative risk, 1.47; 95% confidence interval, 1.19-1.75]). No between-group differences were seen in body mass index.
Improvements in some diet, PA, and sedentary behaviors in adolescents can be enabled through the use of a 1-year, integrated intervention using the computer, health provider counseling, mail, and telephone. The amount of intervention received may contribute to its efficacy.
许多青少年未达到参与定期适度或剧烈体育活动(PA)、限制久坐行为或水果和蔬菜、纤维或总膳食脂肪摄入量的国家指南要求。本研究评估了一项基于医疗保健的干预措施,以改善这些行为。
随机对照试验。
初级保健并在家中进行随访。
878名11至15岁的青少年女孩和男孩。
两种实验条件:(1)初级保健,基于办公室,计算机辅助饮食和PA评估以及基于阶段的目标设定,随后由医疗保健提供者进行简短咨询,并进行12个月的每月邮件和电话咨询;(2)一个针对防晒保护的对照条件。
通过自我报告和加速度计测量的每周中等强度加剧烈PA的分钟数;PA和久坐行为的每周天数的自我报告;以及通过三次24小时饮食回顾测量的来自脂肪的能量百分比和每天水果和蔬菜的份数。体重指数(以千克为单位的体重除以以米为单位的身高的平方计算)是次要结局。
与处于防晒条件下的青少年相比,饮食和PA干预组的女孩和男孩显著减少了久坐行为(干预组与对照组的变化,女孩分别为4.3至3.4小时/天对4.2至4.4小时/天[P = 0.001];男孩分别为4.2至3.2小时/天对4.2至4.3小时/天[P = 0.001])。男孩报告每周有更多的活跃天数(干预组与对照组的变化:分别为4.1至4.4天/周对3.8至3.8天/周[P = 0.01]),女孩的水果和蔬菜份数接近显著差异(干预组与对照组的变化,分别为3.5至4.2份/天对3.5至3.9份/天[P = 0.07])。未观察到来自脂肪的卡路里百分比或每周PA分钟数的干预效果。达到推荐健康指南的青少年百分比在女孩的饱和脂肪摄入量方面有显著改善(干预组与对照组的变化,分别为23.4%至41.0%对18.5%至31%[相对风险,1.33;95%置信区间,1.01 - 1.68]),在男孩参与每周PA天数方面也有显著改善(干预组与对照组的变化,分别为45.3%至55.4%对41.9%至38.0%[相对风险,1.47;95%置信区间,1.19 - 1.75])。体重指数在组间未观察到差异。
通过使用为期1年的综合干预措施,包括计算机、医疗保健提供者咨询、邮件和电话,可以改善青少年的一些饮食、PA和久坐行为。接受的干预量可能有助于其效果。