Randomized, prospective study comparing ulnar neurolysis in situ with submuscular transposition.

OBJECTIVE

To help clarify the optimal surgical strategy for idiopathic, symptomatic ulnar nerve compression at the elbow in terms of overall outcome and morbidity by using objective criteria.

METHODS

Forty-four surgical candidates were recruited prospectively and were randomized into the neurolysis (n = 23) or transposition (n = 21) arm of the study. Preoperative and postoperative outcomes were assessed symptomatically and by performance on McGowen and Louisiana State University Medical Center grading systems at 1 month, 6 months, and 1 year.

RESULTS

Both procedures were equally effective in producing objective neurological improvement (61% in the neurolysis group, 67% in the transposition group). Wound complications, however, were more significant in the transposition group. Three of 21 in the transposition group compared with 0 of 23 in the neurolysis group experienced a deep wound infection.

CONCLUSION

Idiopathic symptomatic ulnar nerve compression at the elbow is adequately treated by both neurolysis in situ and submuscular transposition. Submuscular transposition was associated with a higher incidence of complications. The authors therefore suggest the simpler procedure of neurolysis in situ as the treatment of choice. Submuscular transposition remains appropriate in certain circumstances.