• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

下极肾结石的治疗:冲击波碎石术与经皮肾镜取石术与软性输尿管镜检查术的对比

Management of lower pole renal calculi: shock wave lithotripsy versus percutaneous nephrolithotomy versus flexible ureteroscopy.

作者信息

Preminger Glenn M

机构信息

The Comprehensive Kidney Stone Center, The Division of Urology, Department of Surgery, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, USA.

出版信息

Urol Res. 2006 Apr;34(2):108-11. doi: 10.1007/s00240-005-0020-6. Epub 2006 Feb 7.

DOI:10.1007/s00240-005-0020-6
PMID:16463145
Abstract

Current ureteroscopic intracorporeal lithotripsy devices and stone retrieval technology allow for the treatment of calculi located throughout the intra-renal collecting system. Difficulty accessing lower pole calculi, especially when the holmium laser fiber is utilized, is often encountered. Herein we review our experience where lower pole renal calculi were ureteroscopically managed by holmium laser fragmentation, either in situ, or by first displacing the stone into a less dependent position with the aid of a nitinol stone retrieval device. Lower pole stones less than 20 mm can be primarily treated by ureteroscopic means in patients: that are obese; have a bleeding diathesis; with stones resistant to shockwave lithotripsy (SWL); with complicated intra-renal anatomy; or as a salvage procedure after failed SWL. Lower pole calculi are fragmented with a 200 microm holmium laser fiber via a 7.5 F flexible ureteroscope. For those patients where the laser fiber reduced ureteroscopic deflection, precluding re-entry into the lower pole calyx, a 1.9 F nitinol basket is used to displace the lower pole calculus into a more favorable position, thus allowing for easier fragmentation. A nitinol device passed into the lower pole, through the ureteroscope, for stone displacement cause only a minimal loss of deflection and no significant impact on irrigation. Eighty-five percent of patients were stone free by IVP or CT scan performed at 3 months. Ureteroscopic management of lower pole calculi is a reasonable alternative to SWL or percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PNL) in patients with low volume stone disease. If the stone cannot be fragmented in situ, nitinol basket or grasper retrieval, through a fully deflected ureteroscope, allows for repositioning of the stone into a less dependant position, thus facilitating stone fragmentation.

摘要

当前的输尿管镜体内碎石设备和结石取出技术可用于治疗位于整个肾内集合系统的结石。在使用钬激光光纤时,常常会遇到进入下极结石困难的情况。在此,我们回顾了我们的经验,即通过钬激光碎石术对下极肾结石进行输尿管镜处理,结石可原位处理,也可借助镍钛诺结石取出装置先将结石移位至依赖性较小的位置。对于以下患者,直径小于20mm的下极结石可首选输尿管镜治疗:肥胖患者;有出血倾向者;对冲击波碎石术(SWL)耐药的结石患者;肾内解剖结构复杂者;或SWL失败后的挽救性手术患者。通过7.5F可弯曲输尿管镜,使用200微米的钬激光光纤对下极结石进行碎石。对于那些激光光纤降低了输尿管镜偏转度、无法再次进入下极肾盏的患者,可使用1.9F镍钛诺网篮将下极结石移位至更有利的位置,从而便于更轻松地进行碎石。通过输尿管镜将镍钛诺装置插入下极以移位结石,只会导致极小的偏转度损失,且对冲洗无显著影响。85%的患者在3个月时通过静脉肾盂造影(IVP)或CT扫描显示结石清除。对于结石量少的患者,输尿管镜处理下极结石是SWL或经皮肾镜取石术(PNL)的合理替代方案。如果结石无法原位碎石,通过完全偏转的输尿管镜使用镍钛诺网篮或抓取器取出结石,可将结石重新定位至依赖性较小的位置,从而便于结石碎石。

相似文献

1
Management of lower pole renal calculi: shock wave lithotripsy versus percutaneous nephrolithotomy versus flexible ureteroscopy.下极肾结石的治疗:冲击波碎石术与经皮肾镜取石术与软性输尿管镜检查术的对比
Urol Res. 2006 Apr;34(2):108-11. doi: 10.1007/s00240-005-0020-6. Epub 2006 Feb 7.
2
Nitinol stone retrieval-assisted ureteroscopic management of lower pole renal calculi.镍钛诺取石辅助输尿管镜治疗下极肾结石
Urology. 2000 Dec 20;56(6):935-9. doi: 10.1016/s0090-4295(00)00821-9.
3
Ureteroscopic management of lower-pole renal calculi: technique of calculus displacement.输尿管镜治疗下极肾结石:结石移位技术
J Endourol. 2001 Oct;15(8):835-8. doi: 10.1089/089277901753205852.
4
Retrograde ureteropyeloscopic treatment of 2 cm. or greater upper urinary tract and minor Staghorn calculi.逆行输尿管肾盂镜治疗2厘米及以上上尿路结石和小型鹿角形结石。
J Urol. 1998 Aug;160(2):346-51.
5
Ureteroscopic management of renal calculi in anomalous kidneys.异位肾肾结石的输尿管镜治疗
Urology. 2005 Feb;65(2):265-9. doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2004.09.055.
6
Simultaneous combined use of flexible ureteroscopy and percutaneous nephrolithotomy to reduce the number of access tracts in the management of complex renal calculi.同时联合使用软性输尿管镜和经皮肾镜取石术以减少复杂肾结石治疗中通道的数量。
BJU Int. 2005 Nov;96(7):1097-100. doi: 10.1111/j.1464-410X.2005.05808.x.
7
Flexible ureteroscopy and laser lithotripsy for multiple unilateral intrarenal stones.输尿管软镜联合激光碎石术治疗多发性单侧肾内结石
Eur Urol. 2009 May;55(5):1190-6. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2008.06.019. Epub 2008 Jun 13.
8
Flexible ureteroscopy and laser lithotripsy for single intrarenal stones 2 cm or greater--is this the new frontier?柔性输尿管镜检查及激光碎石术治疗单个直径2厘米及以上的肾内结石——这是新的前沿领域吗?
J Urol. 2008 Mar;179(3):981-4. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2007.10.083. Epub 2008 Jan 22.
9
Single upper-pole percutaneous access for treatment of > or = 5-cm complex branched staghorn calculi: is shockwave lithotripsy necessary?单用上极经皮肾穿刺通路治疗直径大于或等于5厘米的复杂性分支鹿角形结石:是否需要冲击波碎石术?
J Endourol. 2002 Sep;16(7):477-81. doi: 10.1089/089277902760367430.
10
Cost-effectiveness and efficiency of shockwave lithotripsy vs flexible ureteroscopic holmium:yttrium-aluminium-garnet laser lithotripsy in the treatment of lower pole renal calculi.冲击波碎石术与输尿管软镜钬激光碎石术治疗下极肾结石的成本效益和效率比较。
BJU Int. 2011 Dec;108(11):1913-6. doi: 10.1111/j.1464-410X.2011.10172.x. Epub 2011 Mar 31.

引用本文的文献

1
Clinical and cost-effectiveness of percutaneous nephrolithotomy, flexible ureterorenoscopy and extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy for lower pole stones: the PUrE RCTs.经皮肾镜取石术、软性输尿管肾镜检查和体外冲击波碎石术治疗下极结石的临床疗效及成本效益:PUrE随机对照试验
Health Technol Assess. 2025 Aug;29(40):1-186. doi: 10.3310/WFRE6844.
2
Comparative efficacy of different surgical techniques for pediatric urolithiasis-a systematic review and meta-analysis.不同手术技术治疗小儿尿石症的疗效比较——一项系统评价与Meta分析
Transl Androl Urol. 2024 Jul 31;13(7):1127-1144. doi: 10.21037/tau-23-676. Epub 2024 Jul 16.
3
Heavy as a rock or light as dust: a comparison between the perceived workload for extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy, ureterorenoscopy and percutaneous nephrolithotomy.
重如磐石或轻如微尘:体外冲击波碎石术、输尿管肾镜检查和经皮肾镜取石术的感知工作量比较
Cent European J Urol. 2024;77(1):129-135. doi: 10.5173/ceju.2023.214. Epub 2024 Jan 26.
4
Kidney collecting system anatomy applied to endourology - a narrative review.肾脏收集系统解剖学在泌尿外科中的应用——叙述性综述。
Int Braz J Urol. 2024 Mar-Apr;50(2):164-177. doi: 10.1590/S1677-5538.IBJU.2024.9901.
5
AI prediction of extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy outcomes for ureteral stones by machine learning-based analysis with a variety of stone and patient characteristics.基于机器学习的多种结石和患者特征分析对体外冲击波碎石术治疗输尿管结石的效果进行 AI 预测。
Urolithiasis. 2023 Dec 2;52(1):9. doi: 10.1007/s00240-023-01506-7.
6
Extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy (ESWL) versus percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL) or retrograde intrarenal surgery (RIRS) for kidney stones.体外冲击波碎石术 (ESWL) 与经皮肾镜碎石取石术 (PCNL) 或逆行肾内手术 (RIRS) 治疗肾结石的比较。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2023 Aug 1;8(8):CD007044. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD007044.pub4.
7
The Role of Radiological Imaging in the Diagnosis and Treatment of Urolithiasis: A Narrative Review.放射影像学在尿路结石诊断与治疗中的作用:一项叙述性综述
Cureus. 2022 Dec 28;14(12):e33041. doi: 10.7759/cureus.33041. eCollection 2022 Dec.
8
The regular use of calcium channel blockers before flexible URS appears to facilitate primary UAS insertion: a retrospective study in a single center.在输尿管软镜检查(flexible URS)前常规使用钙通道阻滞剂似乎有助于首次输尿管镜鞘(UAS)插入:一项单中心回顾性研究。
Int Urol Nephrol. 2023 Mar;55(3):547-551. doi: 10.1007/s11255-022-03426-8. Epub 2022 Nov 30.
9
Bilateral same-session flexible ureteroscopy for renal stones: a feasible method.同期双侧输尿管软镜治疗肾结石:一种可行的方法。
J Med Life. 2022 Feb;15(2):284-291. doi: 10.25122/jml-2021-0385.
10
Bilateral same session renal stone surgery tolerance and complications.双侧同期肾结石手术的耐受性及并发症
Urol Ann. 2021 Oct-Dec;13(4):336-339. doi: 10.4103/UA.UA_128_20. Epub 2021 Sep 2.